Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\-Contest\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+60\,\s+Issue\s+40\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\-Contest\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+60\,\s+Issue\s+40\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 60, Issue 40 (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:09:20 -0500; Considering the number of comments on this reflector from people who appear to think it's a great idea, no, I sure Scott was quite serious. And frankly, I'm incensed at the private email from someone; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00434.html (8,123 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 60, Issue 40 (score: 1): Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0600; Ron's infuriation is well grounded. It's that kind of "everybody's a cheat" crap that's going to be the end of contesting. Is that what we want? 73, Kelly Ve4xt Considering the number of comments on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00441.html (9,175 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 60, Issue 40 (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:25:29 -0000; I have to agree with you Ron. I like a good argument, and will sometimes take a side I don't particularly agree with just to get into one, but this thread has gone through an evolution that I cannot; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00463.html (10,442 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]