- 1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX CW rubberish CW numbers? (score: 1)
- Author: Stein-Roar Brobakken <post@lb3re.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 21:53:03 +0200
- Hello Thanks for a nice contest Me and my friends experienced MANY stations with rubberish serialnumbers ... Often last two numbers are chopped. If QRS the rythm are ok....then copied well. I wonder
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00036.html (7,406 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX CW rubberish CW numbers? (score: 1)
- Author: K3TN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 10:16:43 +0000 (UTC)
- Rag - I heard that on several signals in the WPX, had to ask for repeats. I think these days that kind of blurry/rubberish CW keying usually turns out to be someone operating remotely, vs. a softwar
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00051.html (7,982 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX CW rubberish CW numbers? (score: 1)
- Author: <wigi@kl0r.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 07:38:41 -0800
- I have had this same problem with Remote Rig... and I do indeed have OTA internet. I thought I had a solution, but I have had some difficulty implementing it. Using Win-test as logging software, I cr
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00056.html (9,301 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu