Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WPX\s+M\/M\s+Distributed\s+Category\s+Update\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX M/M Distributed Category Update (score: 1)
Author: "Ray Higgins (W2RE)" <ray.w2re@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:21:33 -0400
The WW1X team entered the M/M distributed category this weekend. We managed 23.5 million points in adverse conditions in this new category from USA zone #5 with 7 stations and 13 operating positions.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00106.html (7,738 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX M/M Distributed Category Update (score: 1)
Author: Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:18:26 -0600
Great job, Ray, including your technical prowess in accomplishing this. Barry W2UP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00107.html (9,012 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX M/M Distributed Category Update (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 12:13:40 -0700
On 3/29/2021 6:21 AM, Ray Higgins (W2RE) wrote: The WW1X team entered the M/M distributed category this weekend. We managed 23.5 million points in adverse conditions in this new category from USA zon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00111.html (7,689 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX M/M Distributed Category Update (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 16:07:43 -0500
How does it do that? If they were all in one place doing a multi/multi isn't it all the same? Joe WB9SBD On 3/29/2021 2:13 PM, Jim Brown wrote: On 3/29/2021 6:21 AM, Ray Higgins (W2RE) wrote: The WW1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00112.html (8,844 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX M/M Distributed Category Update (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:48:50 -0400
I agree Jim It only benefits a very small number of people. Checking the 3830 scores I only have only seen three entities in this category of which only a couple seemed to be serious efforts. I curio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00114.html (9,411 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX M/M Distributed Category Update (score: 1)
Author: Michael Ritz <w7vo@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 16:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
I agree with Joe for one simple reason: The reason guys are using remotes is because they don't have a station at home to operate from, at least one that is contest worthy! I know one of the guys tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00120.html (10,025 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX M/M Distributed Category Update (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:02:28 -0400
This idea is about technology. Its impact to the number of stations to work is slightly above 0. All these stations were interlocked as well. Not a trivial setup. It got more people on the air for th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00124.html (11,309 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX M/M Distributed Category Update (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:30:18 -0700
But COVID limits most on-site multi ops, so they're operating from home. There are some multi-ops with everyone remote. NR6O, at the N6RO superstation, had 10 operators, all but one (N6RO) remote. 73
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00128.html (8,666 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX M/M Distributed Category Update (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 23:21:39 -0400
MikeI don't think they were interlocked because they were operating from multiple different station locations with the same callsign on different bands. I think the WPX rule is that all the stations
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00131.html (12,256 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu