Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WPX\s+OFF\s+TIMES\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WPX\s+OFF\s+TIMES\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX OFF TIMES (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:18:53 -0500 (EST); I notice in the 2006 rules for WPX contest, that the mention of 60 minute minimum off times has been removed. Is this intentional? Even if not intentional, how can CQ ding someone for less than 60 mi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00318.html (6,821 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX OFF TIMES (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Faber" <andrew.faber@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:29:35 -0800; Ed, I brought this matter to the attention of Steve, K6AW, a few months ago, and he confirmed that the 60-minute off-time requirement was still in effect. He corrected a statement of the rules appear; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00325.html (8,427 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX OFF TIMES (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:51:49 -0600 (CST); Nope, in the spirit of Poisson d'Avril, off time is now 45 hours. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesti; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00327.html (7,572 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]