- 1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX RTTY - change the rules! (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:55:20 -0700
- There is no shortage of RTTY activity, multipliers, or low-band activity. Maybe it's time to make scoring exactly the same for CW/SSB/RTTY WPX contests. Less confusion, more synergy (i.e. log checkin
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00239.html (7,317 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX RTTY - change the rules! (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:25:59 -0800
- Maybe it's time to give points for same-country contacts in CQWW CW & SSB, so we don't have to make zero-point contacts just to get mults. In the WPX RTTY contest, over 60 percent of my QSO's were wi
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00261.html (7,844 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu