The May 2015 issue of CQ Magazine containing the results for the 2014 CQ WW DX Contest CW is now available for electronic subscribers via Zinio. The scores are available from the online database on t
Wow, lot of DQs! Barry W2UP The scores are available from the online database on the CQ WW web site. http://www.cqww.com/scorescw.htm?yr=2014 Enjoy! Randy Thompson, K5ZD Director - CQ WW DX Contest e
Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 00:18:18 -0400
Also a lot more check logs that I would have expected, including a lot of familiar calls. 73 - Jim K8MR In a message dated 5/1/2015 11:33:39 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, w2up@comcast.net writes: Wow,
Not only a lot of DQ's. The #1 SOABHP claimed score TO7A (UT5UGR, op) was DQ'd. I would really like to see the reason(s) and supporting documentation for that one. 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT _____________
Barry W2UP The scores are available from the online database on the CQ WW web site. http://www.cqww.com/scorescw.htm?yr=2014 Enjoy! Randy Thompson, K5ZD Director - CQ WW DX Contest email: k5zd@cqww.c
No. I can think of 3 likely scenarios: 1. using the spotting network and claiming SO 2. transmitting on more than one band at the same time 3. using remote receiver(s) What else could it be? Excess p
DQ information at http://cqww.com/blog/ Mark. N2QT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-co
That's for CQWW SSB only 73, Jorge Enviado desde mi iPhone _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
Hey Mark and all, It appears that the logs DQed on the current Blog is for SSB. I presume that the DQs for CW will be forthcoming. I was curious to know the number of Checklogs that became such after
That's for SSB but I'd guess CW will be posted soon. What would really be enlightening would be to post the DQ'd stations on a world map. http://cqww.com/blog/ Mark. N2QT No. I can think of 3 likely
Very cool! Now how do they know for sure that a station that claimed no assistance, actually used any.? Joe WB9SBD http://cqww.com/blog/ Mark. N2QT No. I can think of 3 likely scenarios: 1. using the
An old favorite of mine - rubber-clocking so as to meet band change requirements - is rendered a lot less viable when the organizers have SDR recordings of the whole contest. I can only find SSB DQs
Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 17:46:28 -0400
It's about time they nailed these guys. Three cheers for the committee. K4XS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
Actually there are. Depends on the design of the radio and also how you set the rise time. See k9yc.com/TXNoise.pdf 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing lis
http://cqww.com/blog/ Bravo on the DQs and the warnings. BUT -- it's awfully hard to believe that only three stations had "wide signals" in this contest! 73, Jim K9YC ________________________________
To summarize from one perspective, money does not guarantee a clean signal for the transmitter. One can ruin the signal of expensive radios by wrong tuning set. And, some expensive radios simply are
The 2014 CW disqualifications have now been posted. It's quite interesting to see the several repeat offenders that made the list for both SSB and CW ... and for the same reasons. 73, Dave AB7E http:
Everybody loses a few contest Qs due to operator failure on the other end, or, horrors!, failure on the home front. It sucks but it happens. I see that nearly all the CQ WW CW 2014 SO disqualificatio