Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+CW\s+2014\s+Results\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 19:50:56 +0200
Good to see the committee is finally taking actions. But sad to see no one got DQ'ed for having too wide a signal. :-( Obviously reporting them with exact times and frequencies is not enough to check
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00071.html (11,241 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 00:11:42 +0100
<snip> I asked this question already before but will gladly repeat it: What is needed for the contest committee to take actions on too wide signals? The CQWW committee took the initiative, some thre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00077.html (11,141 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 19:22:13 -0700
CW - width greater than 500Hz at 40db down SSB - width greater than 6kHz at 40db down Having studied this matter for a while, and having done some measurements of my own, I'll throw these thoughts on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00082.html (12,413 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 20:54:22 -0700
Totally this. A few years ago I was operating in the winter NAQP SSB contest when I tuned across a running K9 station while I was looking for a run frequency. The guy was about S9+10 and totally unre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00087.html (10,781 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 18:59:04 +0200
Hello James, If I feel like getting on the air for a few hours of contesting (unlikely to happen these days) I usually play Unassisted but I stay connected to the local cluster although I keep the sp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00160.html (9,023 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 21:01:19 +0200
It is so far assisted as the spotting might keep you from qsy to another band which were probably your intention in that minute. 73 Peter Hello James, If I feel like getting on the air for a few hour
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00171.html (9,438 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 13:51:49 -0700
Two reasons to not unplug, off the top of my head: 1. Real time propagation and solar weather. A and K indices, flares, etc. 2. Real time local weather. Thunderstorms etc. 73 jeff wk6i -- Jeff Stai ~
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00175.html (9,099 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 23:09:42 +0200
Hello Peter, -- 2. QSO alerting assistance: The use of any technology or other source that provides call sign or multiplier identification along with frequency information to the operator. -- When my
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00180.html (9,285 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: "Mark van Wijk, PA5MW" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 09:09:40 +0200
Your logging program only tells you that because you are somehow connected to a 'QSO alerting assistance'. The example below might prove you did not cheat, it does prove that somehow you have put you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00203.html (11,285 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: Albert Crespo <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 12:08:42 +0200 (CEST)
If you know you are being spotted, this is a big advantage  to you. It informs   whether you are being spotted by many people or just a few , and also as to what part of the world is actually hearing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00207.html (10,894 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 21:18:08 -0500
provides call sign or multiplier identification along with frequency information to the operator. me so I am confident I am not >> cheating if I claim Unassisted. The way I read the rule is a bit di
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00235.html (8,827 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 10:01:10 +0200
Hello KU7Y, Let me stretch it some more. I am waiting for that elusive new one and I am willing to stop my contesting effort for as long as it takes to work one of the last DXCC entities I need which
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00246.html (9,629 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 15:42:07 -0500
Hi Steve, I agree with what you say in that 17m example.... until you get to the last line. Here is why I disagree about checking your own callsign on something like the RBN during a contest. If you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00248.html (11,992 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 16:23:15 +0200
Hello KU7Y, I have never mentioned the RBN network, I was talking about being connected to my local cluster which has only spots made by real people with the W3LPL "heard here and there" as the only
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00251.html (9,370 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu