Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+Committee\s+blog\s+post\s+\-\s+audio\s+recording\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:43:49 -0400
Thanks for the clarification, Bob. Lots of this needs to be in the FAQ. Now, let's combine two scenarios. You operate a clean contest, and finish in the top three, but, you did not record. However, s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00324.html (19,143 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:58:25 -0500 (CDT)
OK, so we have a little potential ambiguity here, based on interpretation. A per Jorge's recent post: C. Audio Recordings: Any single operator entrant (see V.A.1) competing for a top three finish at
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00326.html (11,048 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: w5ov@w5ov.com
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:46:14 -0500
Steve, Since you are not part of the CQWW Committee, what you say is your opinion only, and completely irrelevant. I hope those reading your comments keep that in mind. 73, Bob W5OV On Wed, April 19,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00327.html (29,114 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: w5ov@w5ov.com
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:49:43 -0500
Steve, Can you cite one example of this occurring? ("used as a weapon against people they don't like") On what do you base your allegation? I think the phrase "put up or shut up" applies here. 73, Bo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00328.html (11,464 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: w5ov@w5ov.com
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:58:18 -0500
Gerry, Let me make this brief comment for now. No one has ever been DQed because a "friend spotted them a lot". All DQ's related to spotting are far more *heinous* than that. The concern expressed ab
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00329.html (20,725 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:06:53 -0400
In 41 years of contesting, No DQs or claims of cheating, Bob... So it is not fear driving the questions. It's for clarity. If there was clarity, you would not have all these emails on CQ Contest. 73,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00331.html (22,524 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:05:43 -0500
73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00332.html (31,636 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu