- 21. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 11:56:21 -0700
- Except that in football you aren't even allowed to make a field goal attempt that you are not entitled to. In radiosport, you essentially can ... you make a guess at a callsign or exchange that you d
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00262.html (10,259 bytes)
- 22. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes (score: 1)
- Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 17:58:59 -0500
- Careful Dave, or you'll get a 15 yard penalty for excessive Puritanism! You heard it here first, people. Unskilled operation, be it by inattention, fat-fingered keyboarding, fatigue-induced character
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00263.html (9,330 bytes)
- 23. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes (score: 1)
- Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 17:59:06 -0500
- Its not a bad example at all. We are discussing the REMOVAL of points for operating shortcomings, not for rules violations. If I transpose letters in a call sign, that is an operating shortcoming, ju
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00264.html (8,971 bytes)
- 24. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 19:32:12 -0400
- Hi Hans - I stand by my argument. Busted calls ARE a rules infraction - the rules require that we claim can claim QSO credit only for valid QSO's, which naturally enough, would include a valid callsi
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00266.html (11,190 bytes)
- 25. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes (score: 1)
- Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 02:39:36 +0000
- Just carrying your argument to it's logical extreme. If incorrectly recording a call sign is a violation of the contest rules (you assert that it is so) then XIII of the rules state that such violati
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00267.html (11,893 bytes)
- 26. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Naumann" <W5OV@W5OV.COM>
- Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 07:56:18 -0500
- Hans, I'm sure this won't make you happy, but such an occurrence happened in this past year CQWW contests. Several good qsos began the log, but then it developed into total fantasy and every qso was
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00271.html (12,892 bytes)
- 27. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes (score: 1)
- Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 08:30:55 -0500
- This i exactly where I feel the penalty is a good thing, Copy what is sent, and log what is sent. Copy it wrong, and you get dinged for not being a better operator. Slow down and be sure you got it r
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00274.html (12,662 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu