Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+Rules\s+preview\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+Rules\s+preview\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules preview (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 12:03:36 -0500; A public preview period for the CQ WW DX Contest rules for 2014 is currently underway until July 1. You can see the proposed rule changes at http://cqww.com/blog/?p=337 While we enjoy and monitor the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-06/msg00109.html (7,458 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules preview (score: 1): Author: "Jack Haverty." <k3fiv@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:16:41 -0700; The primary reason for resistance to the ID rule seems to be that more frequent IDing would take time and therefore reduce your score. Perhaps it's worth thinking about how the rules might be structu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-06/msg00132.html (11,644 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules preview (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:21:13 -0500; Let me preface this posting with two points which I feel are utterly fundamental to RadioSport contesting. Point 1) Contesting should reward my "Radioman" skills. Counterpoint 1) Less skilled operati; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-06/msg00151.html (14,090 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules preview (score: 1): Author: "Jack Haverty." <k3fiv@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:11:01 -0700; Hi Hans, Well, there's where we differ... Your model is that each side of a contest QSO is responsible for completely and accurately receiving and copying what the other station transmits, or should; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-06/msg00154.html (17,552 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules preview (score: 1): Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:11:01 -0700; Two proposed CQWW rule changes 5. Signals with excessive bandwidth (e.g., splatter, clicks) or harmonics Define excessive. Or is it like the Supreme Court and pornography? One ham's hard keying is an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-06/msg00158.html (12,854 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules preview (score: 1): Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 06:47:31 +0600; Hank, Thanks a lot for publishing that 1998 explanation from N6AA. This is an excellent stuff on the subject and should go into all contesting textbooks. 73, Igor UA9CDC N6AA on pileup management - 1; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-06/msg00160.html (12,545 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules preview (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 20:45:18 -0700; The fact that you don't consider that to be a penalty gives me some insight into the reasoning process behind your proposal. It also seems to have escaped you that there are elements to logging a QSO; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-06/msg00162.html (8,781 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules preview (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:23:37 -0600; In CQ WW how could you know if the other guy copied your call correct or not. I have yet to catch N1MM logger not sending W0MU during the contest. If Callsigns were part of the exchange then K3FIV mi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-06/msg00170.html (9,930 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]