Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+Scoring\s+System\s+needs\s+revision\?\s*$/: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision? (score: 1)
Author: Dimitri RA3CO <ra9co@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:07:14 +0400
The best post in the thread. Do not fix what is not broken. Anyone that wants a new "fair" contest is welcome to a) enroll into a WRTC competition or b) sponsor a new contest with fair rules. We had
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00079.html (11,548 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision? (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 20:27:27 -0700
But there is Coke Zero and it is good! Change can be good. Just because it is great for you guys in the North East and other areas doesn't mean that it is great for everyone. CQ can do whatever they
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00081.html (10,612 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision? (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:00:55 -0200
LOL. Nobody is trying to fix anything. Just make it even better for the rest of the world. Not only for zone 33/35 stations. It's pretty obvious why you don't want any changes. When you say you spent
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00083.html (14,186 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision? (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 08:01:34 -0800 (PST)
You can find a description of "level playing field" and "fair" at  http://www.wordfight.org/bnw/bnw-unit_packet.pdf 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00086.html (12,698 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 44
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu