Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+Update\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+Update\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: CQWW CC <cqwwcc@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:35:37 -0700; Fellow Contesters, The CQ WW DX contest is coming soon. Many DXpeditions are planned and the anticipation of fall conditions fills the air. This weekend the CQ WW will participate in a Webinar sponso; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00075.html (11,192 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "Timo Klimoff" <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:41:11 +0300; Does this mean that is you are a punk, the best way still is to cheat and if CQWWCC gets you, you just withdraw your log without punishment? Of course it would be an improvement compared to past tha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00077.html (8,041 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "Ken Claerbout" <k4zw@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:19:16 -0400; Still time to register! The event is this Sunday (11-October) at 22:00 UTC. We would welcome your participation. To register click on the following link: https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/874648; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00078.html (7,803 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "Timo Klimoff" <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:46:03 +0300; typo corrected _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00079.html (9,012 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: Bob Cox <bobk3est@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:32:16 -0700; CQ WW Contest Committee Update April 16, 2010 Last falls CQ WW contests experienced the largest level of participation in its history. We have received over 12,000 entries! That is a 17% increase in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00184.html (9,087 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: Bob Cox <bobk3est@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 21:43:02 -0800; November 23, 2010 CQ WW Contest Committee Update Dear Fellow Contesters, We want to bring several subjects to your attention. 1. We are sending you this update to remind you of the new assisted categ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00384.html (9,222 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 07:20:28 -0600 (CST); *C. *Remote skimmers (beyond the 500m station circle) are *not permitted for any category,* except for the *Reverse Beacon Network (RBN).* *Utilization of the RBN is permitted for all Multi-Operator; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00393.html (7,855 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:01:30 -0500; There are good reasons for locating a Skimmer off-site, most notably preventing interference from the transmitters in a multi-multi, and I'm delighted that CQWW has addressed this head-on. If anyone; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00394.html (8,644 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "KB1H" <kb1h@ct.metrocast.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:49:23 -0500; I agree with Dave on this question. I had planned on opening the two skimmers (one remote) to other users rather than having only a local network feeder. There just does not seem to be much differenc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00398.html (9,792 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:11:28 +0000; I'd say the difference is we all know about the RBN, and know where to find it. It aggregates data on all bands from multiple world-wide sites. It is effectively a public skimmer server, one that wil; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00399.html (8,291 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:15:57 -0600 (CST); _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00400.html (7,564 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:40:18 -0600 (CST); _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00403.html (7,382 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "KB1H" <kb1h@ct.metrocast.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:00:13 -0500; It seems we are visiting an old issue. All this sounds like the early packetcluster threads. In the early days we use to close the YCCC network to outside competing clubs but then realized it had no; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00405.html (11,050 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:59:08 -0600 (CST); you can go to: http://www.reversebeacon.net/skimmers.php and get the addresses of many of the active skimmers and connect to them directly if the owner allows it. this way you could use a tool like m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00406.html (9,810 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:01:31 -0600 (CST); p.s. i would also argue the basic premise of having a private remote skimmer as being a 'remote receiver' is flawed. you can not use a remote skimmer through telnet to get the exchange data, only spo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00407.html (11,827 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: kd4d@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:36:50 +0000 (UTC); Hi David: I'm one of those users - I connect to your skimmer and several others. The RBN is a single point of failure. Legislating its use is just like dictating that I can only use one specific pack; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00408.html (10,590 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:17:53 -0500; It doesn't really matter to me since I never use them.contest or no contest, but what exactly is the difference between a personal skimmer located in Europe (for a W/VE contester) and a European Skim; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00409.html (8,323 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: w5ov@w5ov.com; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:47:09 -0500; It has to do with you installing something outside of your own property solely for your own use. This sort of thing is expressly forbidden in the rules. "Public" systems like this that anyone can con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00411.html (9,395 bytes)
19. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: <w3oa@roadrunner.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:50:43 -0500; As paragraph 4 clearly allows the use of remote Skimmers for QSO alerting, I interpret the clarifications to be talking about using a remote Skimmer as a real time receiver and not as a source of tel; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00412.html (9,859 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: Guy Molinari <guy_molinari@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:48:10 +0000; Because it is publicly available and does not necessarily provide an advantage for just the owning op? _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00413.html (9,162 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]