Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+Update\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+Update\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: Neal Campbell <nealk3nc@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:22:50 -0500; VE7CC-1 is a skimmer aggregator as well as a regular dx cluster so its two, two, two spotters in one. 73 Neal Campbell Abroham Neal Software www.abrohamnealsoftware.com (540) 645 5394 _______________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00414.html (10,495 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: Neal Campbell <nealk3nc@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:24:39 -0500; I also think picking one spot source over another is hard to defend. 73 Neal Campbell Abroham Neal Software www.abrohamnealsoftware.com (540) 645 5394 _______________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00415.html (11,277 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:27:37 +0000; Quote the rule. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net _______________________________________________ CQ-Con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00416.html (10,723 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:02:54 -0500; Unless everyone can use the remote receiver and then its okay... Glad I stick to simple unassisted. More fun...less fine print. Good Luck to all this weekend. Ed N1UR Dave, The pertinent part is: 3.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00418.html (12,536 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: w5ov@w5ov.com; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:14:08 -0500; Dave, The pertinent part is: 3. All transmitters and receivers used by the entrant must be located within a single 500-meter diameter circle or within the property limits of the station licensee?s ad; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00419.html (11,865 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:10:42 +0000; Ah, but that does not prohibit use of spotting networks, which are specifically allowed by: 4. Single Operator Assisted (All Band or Single Band): ... QSO alerting assistance is allowed (this include; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00420.html (14,207 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: k3mm@verizon.net; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:30:02 -0600 (CST); So this turns into an old battle about what constitutes public vs private... So the next question is, if a skimmer source is registered with RBN, can you connect to it directly rather than thru the R; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00425.html (10,074 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:15:58 +0000; After I first sent this question k3est replied that he was traveling and forwarded the request to "others"... how about it "others"? can we proceed with using skimmers the way we have in other contes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00426.html (10,515 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "Bob Naumann" <W5OV@W5OV.COM>; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:48:36 -0600; The focus of this discussion has been directed at the least important part of the announcement. The most important part is: *Remote skimmers (beyond the 500m station circle) are *not permitted for an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00436.html (12,964 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:58:05 +0000; No, the MOST important part of this is that skimmers providing spotting information ARE NOT 'remote receivers'. They do not let you make contacts better by hearing the stations you are making contact; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00438.html (15,432 bytes)
31. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: w5ov@w5ov.com; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:08:22 -0500; Again, 3. All transmitters and receivers used by the entrant must be located within a single 500-meter diameter circle or within the property limits of the station licensee?s address, whichever is gr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00448.html (17,653 bytes)
32. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:15:28 -0500; That's inventive but I don't think it's what the words say. :-) If that's really what Bob meant, he or someone official needs to say so. 73, Mark 73, Mark "Bob Naumann" <W5OV@W5OV.COM> wrote: -- Sent; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00450.html (14,767 bytes)
33. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:19:28 +0000; I assume that 'precludes' should be 'includes'?? assuming that is correct then should not any receiver attached to a person who is putting spots on the 'human' spotting network is included as a rece; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00451.html (20,209 bytes)
34. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: w5ov@w5ov.com; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:27:41 -0500; Mark, I am a member of the CQWW Committee. Bob W5OV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00454.html (15,854 bytes)
35. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: w5ov@w5ov.com; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:33:52 -0500; Dave, I'm afraid I am not capable of communicating with you. I apologize for my verbal inadequacies. 73, Bob W5OV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00457.html (22,071 bytes)
36. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:45:43 +0000; Well, I'll be darned... I didn't know that either. It would be nice that when members of the committee are expressing official opinions of the rules that they would sign with some indicator of such.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00458.html (17,641 bytes)
37. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: Bob Cox <bobk3est@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:48:59 -0800; November 24, 2010 CQ WW Update The CQ WW Contest Committee would like to issue a clarification *to part 4*from our last update (November 23, 2010). *This clarification replaces the recently issued CQ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00462.html (8,958 bytes)
38. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>; Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:28:17 +0000; So now we just have to hunt down any 'private' spotting networks and either make sure no contesters are using them or that they get opened to the world! Or, as implied by this, define private as bein; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00469.html (11,750 bytes)
39. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "Bob Naumann" <W5OV@W5OV.COM>; Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 07:12:35 -0600; Dave, You're persistent, though misguided. There's really nothing new here. What was forbidden before is still forbidden. What was allowed before is still allowed. As has been said before, it's just; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00470.html (13,384 bytes)
40. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update (score: 1): Author: "Lee Sawkins" <ve7cc@shaw.ca>; Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:56:48 -0800; As well as VE7CC-1 ve7cc.net port 23 there are two more CC Clusters that have enabled skimmer spots. These are: N5IN-2 dxspots.net port 23 VE1DXI ve1dxi.no-ip.com port 23 Users are required to "set/s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00482.html (8,430 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]