Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+tips\s+and\s+tricks\s+\-\s+not\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+tips\s+and\s+tricks\s+\-\s+not\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 13:28:48 -0500; On Dec 15, 2004, at 8:08 AM, Keith Kerr wrote: I actually recall a few years ago (but apologies if I am misquoting him here) Fred, K3ZO , an operator whom I much admire and respect, saying this was w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00732.html (10,495 bytes)
2. RE: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 26 Dec 2004 15:51:33 -0600; I wonder if that depends on where in the country you are? - packet isn't that much of an influence here in the middle of the country but SO2R definitely is. But really that's an afterthought as far a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00706.html (10,193 bytes)
3. RE: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 21:27:01 +0100; CQing. Now I better understand why I failed to improve EU 20 m CW QRP record! I do spend a lot of time S&P even in LP category. But I have fun at radio... 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU ___________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00705.html (8,292 bytes)
4. RE: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson, K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 00:29:44 -0000; Why the emphasis on SO2R in this conversation? It is really packet, and its use by SOA+MS+MM stations that is making frequencies more difficult to find. The packet assisted entries can rely on other; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00702.html (10,222 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: mike dl dormann <w7dra@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:13:03 -0500; it seems to me, as a dx station with 100 and a dipole at best, if i hover around the edges of the contest frequencies and call cq, i am not bothering anyone but when i am found the dogs of war make s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00699.html (8,455 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: Boris Knezovic T93Y <t93y@lol.ba>; Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 18:08:25 +0100; Umh, you mean disqualified for WASTING almost one-half hour trying to be a "Gentlemen" whilst my competitors were cranking out QSOs? Not to mention, excessive wear and tear on the special "QRL?" exte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00697.html (11,194 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 25 Dec 2004 09:20:12 -0600; What do they say about two wrongs? Reaction I've received since my post has made it clear that "blind" CQing is NOT standard operating procedure at contest stations. Eric, I know you're not the only; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00693.html (12,054 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 23:22:36 -0800; Umh, you mean disqualified for WASTING almost one-half hour trying to be a "Gentlemen" whilst my competitors were cranking out QSOs? Not to mention, excessive wear and tear on the special "QRL?" exte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00692.html (12,354 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 24 Dec 2004 00:13:44 -0600; To be blunt but honest, anyone who employs this technique should be disqualified. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com ___________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00686.html (10,117 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: Eric Hilding <p3@hilding.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:34:34 -0800; FYI, my fully-automated SSB operation (no microphone) in the ARRL SS (Phone) weekend from K6VVA on the 1st day made frequent use of a special "QRL?" button. This triggered a .wav file which resulted; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00670.html (10,094 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: Eric Hilding <p3@hilding.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:50:18 -0800; Absolutely nothing wrong...except: When I operated as "DX" last Spring, after a food or shower break, I came back on 20m looking for a "clear frequency". After 20 to 30 M-I-N-U-T-E-S of "QRL?" only t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00665.html (10,967 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:00:15 +0000; ES5TV continued from W2UP's description of what CQing on a frequency without first asking if the frequency was in use can be like for those already there: I absolutely agree with Barry that plain CQ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00587.html (12,078 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: Keith Kerr <k.kerr@abdn.ac.uk>; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:18:53 +0000; I rather regret dragging Fred into this! I agree 100% with your comment: no right of ownership is/was assumed. If someone comes back I'm off. Barry W2UP, however makes a very valid point and I can se; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00583.html (12,521 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: Steve Root <steve.root@culligan4water.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:53:03 +0000; This scenario isn't far-fetched. It actually happens a lot if you operate from Behind the Black Hole. That's why a "QRL?" or ditdit-dit is very much appreciated and should be encouraged. 73 Steve K0; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00582.html (10,471 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@mail.ee>; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:45:13 +0200; I absolutely agree with Barry that plain CQ is rude and destructive. 1. Any CQ is longer than QRL or ?. It disturbes my operating much more and believe me, in EU there are tens of stations looking fo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00581.html (13,742 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:56:49 -0800; _________________________________________________________ What do you think? -- Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lis; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00579.html (10,356 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:24:14 -0800; _________________________________________________________ Point well taken, but I've used Fred's method for years (RTTY) and I don't think that scenario has ever happened. If someone (the original fr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00576.html (11,333 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:44:41 -0500; I think it's bad advice and rude, and here's why: Let's say I'm trying to copy a weak UA9 who answered my CQ. Fred comes along and does a short CQ. A loud DL answers him. He doesn't notice the weak U; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00572.html (11,570 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Faber" <andrew.faber@gte.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:24:06 -0800; I think Fred's idea was to do a short CQ, but not with the sense that you now "own" the frequency. If a "rightful occupier" shows up within a short period of time, you would move off. 73, andy, ae6y; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00571.html (11,265 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:45:04 -0800; _________________________________________________________ It was Fred, K3ZO, who recommended a short (emphasis on short) CQ instead of QRL?. I thought it good advice then and still do now. -- Bill W6; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00568.html (10,191 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]