Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\/KL7\s+in\s+lower\s+states\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQWW/KL7 in lower states (score: 1)
Author: Frank Grossmann <frank@grossmann.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:32:23 +0000
Hi all, hi contest committee , Randy, sorry if this has been asked before. I worked KL7HM who is in Arizona, zone 3. He was sending out "KL7HM" as callsign, and Win-Test recorded this as Alaska, with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00328.html (6,812 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW/KL7 in lower states (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:04:55 -0400
You should log the call and zone sent. Your logging program suggested a zone but what was sent is what must be logged. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00332.html (8,298 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW/KL7 in lower states (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:49:40 +0100
Always check the zone the log program suggests(!) before you hit the "enter" button, esspecially with stations from countries divided in several CQ zones such as the US, Canada en Russia. In other pa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00335.html (9,445 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW/KL7 in lower states (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:57:37 -0500
This question has come up several times so I will answer it here. You should log the call sign as sent. The log checking software will handle placing the call in the right country (or judging if the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00338.html (9,403 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW/KL7 in lower states (score: 1)
Author: Frank Grossmann <frank@grossmann.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 13:14:14 +0000
Thank you for the answers, I anticipated this answer from Randy and I really understand what the CQWW contest committee wants. Really Win-Test should solve this issue - good old CT had a function whe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00018.html (9,912 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW/KL7 in lower states (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 08:00:11 -0400
<<Really Win-Test should solve this issue - good old CT had a function where you could assign a different DXCC country from the QSO entry line (you just type callsign=dxcc/enter).>> Wintest used to b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00032.html (7,934 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] CQWW/KL7 in lower states (score: 1)
Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:29:44 -0500
I am ancient enough to remember that when my parents moved us to a new house about three blocks away I had to sign WA9AUM/9 for months until the FCC finally changed my license. Now, I would have no p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00040.html (7,577 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW/KL7 in lower states (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Merrill, W5GN" <w5gn@mxg.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 12:35:11 -0500
Long ago, I suggested to the FCC that one simple solution would have been to double up the number in the callsign, at least for the continental 48, so I'd be W51GN if I operated for one-land. (And WP
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00041.html (8,360 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW/KL7 in lower states (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:06:01 -0700
I'm missing the solution part of that. How would that be any different than signing W5GN/1, other than having one less character and making things more ambiguous for logging programs since many count
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00042.html (9,416 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW/KL7 in lower states (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:27:22 -0500 (CDT)
Nice thought, but those calls are used on low-power commercial TV stations and in other non-Amateur services. 73 Long ago, I suggested to the FCC that one simple solution would have been to double up
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00043.html (9,356 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW/KL7 in lower states (score: 1)
Author: Tom Horton <k5iid@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Barry...  It was just much too simple and logical for the government... Now if you had suggested something like **W51GN/"state"/**  that would probably have worked. By the way the ** would be include
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00045.html (10,708 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] CQWW/KL7 in lower states (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 22:12:05 +0000 (GMT)
Barry, W51GN? What sort of drug-induced, hallucinatory state were you in when you came up with that idea? Oh...never mind. Answered my own question. Doug _____________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00047.html (7,588 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] CQWW/KL7 in lower states (score: 1)
Author: KL7RA <richkl7ra@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 05:04:07 -0500
True conversations from Alaska. CQ 20 meters KL7RA "are you in Alaska?" Yeah, why do you have to ask? "the last six were not and I'm trying for WAS." CQ contest KL7RA "kl7xyz" KL7XYZ 59 one "59 three
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00050.html (8,637 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu