Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: k7fr@televar.com (Gary Nieborsky); Date: Fri Oct 3 09:20:58 1997; Looking brave souls to venture into the hinterlands of Eastern Washington for either or both CQWW extravaganzas. M/M or M/S. Last year one of the brave souls awoke Sunday morning to a raging blizzard; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00051.html (6,548 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: "Tony Rogozinski" <trogo@telegraphy.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:53:34 -0000; I will not be able to use the HK1AR QTH in Cartagena for CQWW SSB or CW this year so the station is available to reserve for either or both contests. All antennas are working FB and I will be putting; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00564.html (6,844 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:33:45 -0600; Okay, I'll warm up the CQWW SSB pot with a few comments... I plan to be operating SOAB HP, from my southwest New Mexico QTH. My goals are similar to previous years - have the highest SOAB score west; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00096.html (9,524 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: "PY2NY, Vitor" <py2ny.vitor@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:52:02 -0200; Well, I will try to do that from Oms station at Araraquara (SP - Brasil) and looking to do more than 3.500 QSOs on high power situation. I really hope to do more on 10m now, because something is happ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00102.html (11,619 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 20:22:12 -0400; Its actually called the CQ World Wide DX Contest. The reason that domestic contacts do not count for points should be quite clear based on the actual name of the contest. I believe the rules were ame; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00147.html (6,863 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:52:34 -0600; Yeah, but there is still the need for those stupid zero pointers for zone and country credit... You're correct about the reason for having US to US points in the RTTY contest. I'm all for the change; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00148.html (7,857 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:46:36 -0700; The CQ WW RTTY DX Contest rules include VE areas and US states as multipliers in order to better balance the multiplier opportunity between European and NA participants. In recent years about 3000 l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00149.html (8,886 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 10:08:19 -0700; [Ed W0YK] Same rationale. Europe has far more QSO points (as well as mults) available in a comparable geographic area to VE/US. EU countries are similar in size to US states and VE areas. "Growing up; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00150.html (8,195 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: Bill via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:42:12 +0000 (UTC); I. OBJECTIVE: For amateurs around the world to contact as many other stations in as many CQ zones and countries as possible. This doesn't mention domestic contacts at all. Maybe someday the scoring; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00151.html (8,526 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:55:53 -0400; If that is the case then we shouldn't be able to contact US stations for the country and zone mult. I find this to be an anomaly for two reasons: 1. You try to contact US stations to get the zone and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00152.html (9,827 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:22:45 -0400; Actually, since the CQ WW RTTY contest was happy to get 500 logs in back in the late 90s, I think it was likely to have at least someone to work. But I could be wrong. Now that it has "grown up" very; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00153.html (9,889 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 13:33:01 -0400; If all contests were the same, where would the interest be in that? I respect the fact that we are all entitled to our opinions. Checking my log I don't find N1UR on RTTY, and W2UP, not since 2004? I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00154.html (10,134 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: robert <wa1fcn@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:35:41 -0500; GM Ed You say it has become much more popular...... I say it is just because of it's present rules. Why correct something that isn't broke. Just my; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00155.html (9,741 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: Bob Kupps via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:21:40 +0000 (UTC); "Yeah, but there is still the need for those stupid zero pointers for zone and country credit..." IMO that is the rule that should be changed. Then maybe you guys can hear some real DX calling you i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00156.html (10,303 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 17:22:50 -0600; Shelby, That's correct (for me). I stopped RTTY contesting about then. However, I still have a vested interest in my record :-) Barry W2UP 73, Shelby Yeah, but there is still the need for those stu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00157.html (10,983 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:13:12 -0500; Some parts of Europe (like SV for example) are also very close to 2 other continents, so the ease of working high point QSOs is greater as well, especially on the low bands. _________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00160.html (9,419 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:18:54 -0500; Some stations, like those in the US, can get the zone multipliers by working other countries. I can get zones 3, 4 and 5 by working Canada. I don't have to work a station in my country to get them, s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00161.html (11,945 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:08:41 +0700; The more any contest is an American contest (more pts), the less fun it is for non-EU DX. For this category, everyone work everyone is the most fun. The others in non-EU are just standing around wait; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00163.html (9,855 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 19:27:38 -0700; I strongly agree with Ed Muns. DX contests are quite different when worked from W6 as compared to W1. Without the points and mults for NA QSOs, most of us out here wouldn't bother, or wouldn't take; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00164.html (9,620 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 05:56:14 -0400; Shelby - K4WW stated - "If all contests were the same, where would the interest be in that? I respect the fact that we are all entitled to our opinions. Checking my log I don't find N1UR on RTTY, and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00166.html (9,482 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]