Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+CW\s+2011\s+WITHDRAWN\s+lOGS\.\s+$Was\s+Marathon\s+Cheating$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+CW\s+2011\s+WITHDRAWN\s+lOGS\.\s+$Was\s+Marathon\s+Cheating$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW 2011 WITHDRAWN lOGS. (Was Marathon Cheating) (score: 1): Author: brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 06:43:38 +0100 (BST); This situation has become a complete fiasco. We have been told that it was an error of omission that certain logs had been withdrawn and not mentioned in the detail of the contest results report.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00183.html (9,602 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW 2011 WITHDRAWN lOGS. (Was Marathon Cheating) (score: 1): Author: Davor Kucelin <kucelin@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 08:10:20 -0700 (PDT); I see also double standards. In 2008 CQWW CW contest CC did DQ lot of us for moving some qso times. For exapmple just 12 qsos in 2008 ment DQ. Nowdays moving lot of qsos is just yellow card. Wonder w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00191.html (7,631 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]