Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+Committee\s+Restructured\s*$/: 56 ]

Total 56 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: "Kip Edwards" <kedwards@ltol.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 06:03:47 -0700
"Those archaic, super-simple rules are what make most US DX contests fun only for folks in the Atlantic basin" I've been entering the CQWW contests for 40 years from the U.S. West Coast, the Caribbea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00097.html (11,988 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:48:44 -0400
I think the CQ WW contest works fine the way it is. And judging by the growth over the past 20 years, thousands would be indicating the same. I would love the suggestions being made to either rescue
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00099.html (8,703 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 10:40:28 -0400
Actually, there's been a lot of discussion over the years and many suggestions made to deal with this problem. Plus alternate scoring tests to see what happens (not much). The only thing I can see wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00100.html (11,408 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:37:02 -0400
-1 point per contact for everybody whatever the country, the continent or the zone. (no more indecent continental border advantage as EA8, CN or even some extreme East Coast) -The US states, the Cana
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00103.html (12,238 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:00:30 -0400
and I work hard to have my home station efficient while staying reasonable. You are wondering why DX will not be present anymore in a DX contest? As it is already the case my proposition cannot be th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00105.html (14,585 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: "Helmut Mueller" <helmut@photo42.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 19:48:52 +0200
You want to win it sitting in your arm chair at home? You are wondering why DX will not be present anymore in a DX contest? You are wondering why CN, D4, CT3, P4 e.t.c. stops spending $$$$$$$$$ if yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00106.html (13,529 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:19:56 -0700
No one every went broke overestimating the stupidly of the human species. :) So how popular are they in OC? In SE AS? They are certainly NOT popular in Zone 3. And don't compare them to ARRL DX, whic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00107.html (9,311 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Jim George <n3bb@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 20:01:28 -0500
Agree. At my weekly "radio lunch" with K5NA, K5OT, W5JAW, and N5TW, we came up with the same thing. Everyone should be able to work his/her own country for one point. This would not only encourage mo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00109.html (14,167 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:54:05 -0400
Great idea Jim N3BB!!!! 1 point for contacts within your country give the single-band ops like me a reason to stay on the air... Us single-band ops would really love that opportunity. 73s Dave WN4AFP
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00113.html (15,768 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Huff David J <HuffDavidJ@JohnDeere.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 06:51:35 +0000
I think one of the things sorely missing from the contest is more DIGITAL modes on VHF/UHF, other than EME/meteor. There is a large amount of VHF / UHF and up that could benefit from digital use, but
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00114.html (11,088 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Helmut Mueller <helmut@photo42.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:00:36 +0200 (CEST)
Guys .... As always, there are about 10+ people moaning about the rules versus approximately 10.000 people involved (9000 logs) per LEG in one of the biggest contest per year. So the committee is doi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00116.html (18,291 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:42:20 -0700
Living in VE2, YOU don't need more multipliers, but WE in Zone 3, where EU and AF is MUCH more difficult to work on 40, 80, and 160, DO need more multipliers to compensate for those EU and AF mults t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00123.html (11,061 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:28:25 -0400
I do not make those suggestions for myself but to answer to the Randy's question : "what do you suggest would make CQ WW more interesting for those not bordering the Atlantic Ocean?" So in addition t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00128.html (12,164 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:13:36 -0400
There is a MUCH MORE SIMPLE way to kill half of the objections being made and that come around every year. Just have a default "own country and zone" double mult added for the first Q on each band. T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00136.html (9,040 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:58:02 -0400
This sounds very similar to the current CQWW RTTY rules shown below: There is an incentive to work DX but making local stateside QSOs is still worthwhile. CQWW RTTY is a fun contest. B. QSO Points: S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00138.html (11,009 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 19:11:39 -0700
Yes - if you live on the east coast and have a chip shot to Europe. Little different from the left coast. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00142.html (8,528 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Richard King <k5na@ecpi.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:29:49 +0000
I don't usually speak up in these kinds of discussions. But this was one of the solutions that was tossed about last week when me and some other local guys were talking at lunch about CQWW scoring. P
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00143.html (9,974 bytes)

38. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:17:22 -0400
I don't believe that CQWW has ever been a contest that truly has had a level playing field. Those stations on the continental boundaries have always had a big advantage. Not that they really need tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00144.html (7,297 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:58:42 -0400
Relative to Richards last point. You can actually just enter your own call as the first Q as you start a band, and it instantly gives you the double mult and zero Q points. Just allow that method and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00145.html (10,857 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:06:52 -0500
CAUTION: The CQ WW log checking software ignores QSOs with your own call. I.e., you won't get mult credit for working yourself... In the old days, people would log a QSO and not know how to delete it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00146.html (13,091 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu