Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+Survey\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+Survey\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: "kenke3x@gmail.com"<kenke3x@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:24:28 -0400; "So very sadly, today's Generation X has no clue on how to operate, and it shows.... But hey, look at all the new "operators" we've brought into contesting. Oh boy.............. > "As a member of "Ge; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00437.html (10,416 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:46:11 -0600; There it is, in two clear paragraphs. Dit-dit -- 73, de Hans, K0HB "Just a boy and his radio" -- Sea stories at --> http://K0HB.wordpress.com Superstition trails --> http://OldSlowHans.com __________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00440.html (9,787 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:16:17 -0700; The actual truth of the matter is that there are VERY few Generation X'ers in ham radio at all ... certainly not in HF radiosport. Of course they don't know how to operate in the manner you and I fee; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00442.html (11,336 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:27:20 -0400; Is that "forced" really true? Let's arbitrarily say that "competitive" is "in the top 5 of a category". Let's arbitrarily take the CQ WW CW 2011 final scores and zoom in on US LP, and compare top fi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00443.html (9,431 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:17:00 -0700; And autopilots, and LCD map displays, and depth sounders, and self-furling jibs, and ... it's a pretty long list. I'll bet there are very few sailors today who go beyond the sight of shore without so; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00444.html (11,639 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:22:21 -0700; I don't see how those terms do anything other than exaggerate your particular bias against internet aids. There are other forms of assistance that fall into the current assisted categories that don't; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00445.html (10,197 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:24:37 +0100; K5ZD wrote: I bet sailboat racing was a lot different before they had GPS. USA 17 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_17_(yacht)> is a trimaran measuring 90-foot (27 m) length-on-waterline, maximum bea; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00446.html (9,939 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:18:12 -0600; and Indy and NASCAR racing has not evolved either. Those are some might cool looking Model A's! Mike W0MU --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00448.html (12,324 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:39:51 +0000; I bet sailboat racing was a lot different before they had GPS. Sometimes I don't make my points clearly. "no one, anywhere, uses another form of propulsion in sailboat racing and claims to be sailin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00449.html (11,162 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:12:51 -0400; Interesting question, Bill. In WPX CW last year, the top SO(A)AB HP station would have placed eighth in SOAB HP. The mult total of the Assisted winner was higher than all but one of the Unassisted to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00450.html (12,111 bytes)
31. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:11:26 -0500; On 3/19/2013 12:27 PM, Tim Shoppa wrote: Many of us, me included, do not want the two combined. In my opinion, once that were to happen, the traditional single ops would be forced to use spotting if; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00454.html (9,605 bytes)
32. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:16:11 -0600; Good post! My youngest just turned 18. He got his general two or three years ago when we were traveling a bunch to Montana. I enjoyed handing out counties and he got involved. He got quite turned off; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00455.html (12,201 bytes)
33. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:18:05 -0500; Lets see him do that again on a dial-up connection,,, Joe WB9SBD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00457.html (8,365 bytes)
34. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: w5ov@w5ov.com; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:39:54 -0500; Paul, While I appreciate your tenacity with this, your analogy of assistance being "propulsion" is the one that is incorrect; Randy's analogy of using a GPS in sailing is indeed comparable to spottin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00462.html (12,435 bytes)
35. [CQ-Contest] CQWW survey (score: 1): Author: "Abrams, Saul" <SAbrams@dhses.ny.gov>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:17:32 +0000; Doug, KR2Q, has provided some very useful information that I admit I hadn't read before. Thank you very much. However, his comments only addressed an example I used in my note. He didn't address the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00465.html (9,028 bytes)
36. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@Earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:01:22 -0400; I would like to comment on a couple of points made. 1) WPX is NOT CQWW relative to this issue. Anyone chasing spots in WPX is losing before they start, so of course WC1M could care less if the catego; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00474.html (11,069 bytes)
37. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:00:39 -0600; Actually what Randy was pointing out that ALL participants were bound by the same rules. Boats must be X length, sails X Size, can use gps or not. Maybe they have different classes for smaller or lar; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00476.html (14,020 bytes)
38. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey (score: 1): Author: Toivo Hallikivi <toivo.hallikivi@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 19:49:01 -0100; Hello, I don't read the reflector daily and I seem to have missed the big pile-up of postings on the survey-subject. After spending a lot of time reading them and after completing the survey myself I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00564.html (9,601 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 38
Page: [1] [2]