Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+Survey\s+\-\s+One\s+Soab\s+category\s+\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+Survey\s+\-\s+One\s+Soab\s+category\s+\!\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey - One Soab category ! (score: 1): Author: IK1HJS - GMAIL <ik1hjs@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:05:00 +0100; Answering to Jim (K4PQL): With my maximum respect :sorry but no. It is absolutely not very clear that there is no consensus. What you are reading on this reflector is just the top of an iceberg. How; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00463.html (14,541 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Survey - One Soab category ! (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jordan" <k4qpl@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 22:38:11 -0400; Carlo, First of all, you've busted my call. Must have been using skimmer. HI My point is that it doesn't matter if you really do have a survey that is accurate down to two decimal points of a percent; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00475.html (16,694 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]