Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+and\s+0\s+pointers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+and\s+0\s+pointers\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers (score: 1): Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 04:43:21 -0700 (PDT); I have been trying to ignore this thread but: 0 pointers are not all zero for the contestor calling you... He may need you to fill that USA zone in his log... That QSO is not zero for him... He may b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00153.html (8,297 bytes)
22. [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers (score: 1): Author: "James Cassidy" <jimki7y@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 07:26:48 -0700; I think the higher percentage of 0 pointers have to be those who are not familiar with the contest rule and are just trying to help. Changing to the multiplier without a QSO would not help that situa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00161.html (8,793 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers (score: 1): Author: "Rick Dougherty NQ4I" <nq4i@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 07:34:38 -0400; Hi Ken...nice analysis, but you have missed the mark...the two cases stated are not as representative as the past 10 years worth of contest data...I have historically had more zero pointers than anyo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00163.html (12,807 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers (score: 1): Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:32:16 -0400; I think there is a desire to eliminate intracountry QSO parties - as in what we see in the IARU contest where large stations make literally hundreds of unique QSOs - all with in-country stations. Now; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00164.html (14,105 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers (score: 1): Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:39:54 -0400; Be careful what you ask for Rick. You purport to want to level the playing field (something which really can never be done). In fact, you're going to make a perceived disadvantage even worse. If you; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00165.html (14,065 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 07:48:51 -0700; And right now - all of those broken USA calls do not affect your score but if you get one point for each one they will lower your score. I do not think I would like to see this change to the CQ WW po; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00166.html (11,406 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers (score: 1): Author: "EC1CT Fernando" <ec1cwg@dxhunters.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:40:11 +0200; I agree with Denis on this. Last CQ WW I was in Colorado with EA1BXN at W0LSD´s station (thanks a lot, Ken). We made hundread of zero pointers and dozen of unique calls. I´m truly convin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00169.html (8,249 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers (score: 1): Author: "Courtney Judd" <k4wi@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 09:56:33 -0500; Rick, I am 100% behind you on this! Since most of my contesting is on 10 mtrs, I also have the same problem with zero pointers and find them to be very frustrating indeed. I have the same propagation; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00171.html (9,028 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers (score: 1): Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 08:25:11 -0700; The distance from San Diego to Seattle is about 1000 miles. Both are in zone 3. Central Texas (Zone 4) is about the same distance. Using your suggestion, I would get zero points for the Seattle QSO,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00172.html (9,391 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers (score: 1): Author: Gerard Lynch <gerrylynch@freenetname.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 22:19:41 +0100; That was a long time ago. Since then activity from Japan has dropped precipitously and activity in Europe has increased dramatically as well. The sheer QSO volume, especially on the low bands, in Eur; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00186.html (12,260 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 30
Page: [1] [2]