Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+hours\s+of\s+operation\:\s+analysis\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQWW hours of operation: analysis (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optonline.net
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 00:08:10 +0000 (GMT)
Well Chris, very interesting stats. Never would I have guessed that only 11% of all SOAB entrants operate more than 30 hours. We are a very small group, indeed! I hope this lines up okay. Group = hou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00095.html (7,368 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW hours of operation: analysis (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 08:57:21 EDT
operate more than 30 hours. We are a very small group, indeed! <|||? I hope this lines up okay. Group = hours of operation as per Chris' email. 42-48 1.92% 1.92% 36-42 3.21% 5.13% 30-36 6.15% 11.28%
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00104.html (7,846 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW hours of operation: analysis (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 6:41:43 -0400
Itd be interesting to do a hours of operation analysis at the peak of the cycle, as opposed to 2006 which was on the verge of being the absolute bottom of the cycle... While you'll probably see an in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00113.html (9,423 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW hours of operation: analysis (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 12:04:41 -0500
Richard - NN3W sez: "While you'll probably see an incremental change in the number of hams operating 40-48, I'll bet money that the percentage over 24 hours increases dramatically." Bob - Kay Zero "R
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00118.html (10,706 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW hours of operation: analysis (score: 1)
Author: "Cedrick \"Fred\" Johnson - WT2P" <fredwt2p@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:46:38 -0400
Bawk Bawk.. I know during the previous (mid-90's) cycle I didn't operate the full 48, but when it was 'worth my while' as conditions improved, I would begin to do closer to the full 48. I think 3W do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00127.html (12,056 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW hours of operation: analysis (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:26:49 +0200
As much as I admire the magic of sunspots I don&acute;t believe in their potential to make family commitments and activities of everyday life disappear. (And who really wants to experience family and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00168.html (8,645 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW hours of operation: analysis (score: 1)
Author: k8gt@twmi.rr.com
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:08:07 -0400
Agreed Fred. With my modest station, in a DX contest, if I can work down below the first one or two layers of stations, I'll stay interested and be able to "stay in the chair" longer. But if I get bo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00203.html (8,709 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu