Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+question\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQWW question (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:28:09 -0700 (PDT); I recently saw the latest issue of CQ (I no longer subscribe due to their views on the CW requirement), and the rules for the CQWW contest were listed. It says that all amateur frequencies between 1.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00054.html (8,292 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW question (score: 1): Author: wo4o@juno.com; Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 22:54:17 -0500; Now... that's thinking out of the 'box'. Go for it! 73 Ric Wo4o http://www.qrz.com/callsign/Wo4o ...-.- On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:28:09 -0700 (PDT) John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com> writes: ______________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00055.html (9,182 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW question (score: 1): Author: "Timo Klimoff" <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 07:11:07 +0300; At least in Finland, regulations determine that QSOs on 60 meters are not amateur radio traffic. I suppose same is in the UK eg. too. So with this logic you could make contest QSOs also on 11 meters; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00056.html (8,049 bytes)
4. RE: [CQ-Contest] CQWW question (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:18:26 -0000; not the 11m contesters may get a bit upset at that. They already have their own contests, dxcc awards, spotting network, dx-peditions, iota awards, etc. they might be a bit upset if we move in on th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00057.html (8,621 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW question (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 07:43:03 -0500 (CDT); Hams in the USA could probably make some contest QSO's on 60 meters but only with other USA stations. I believe the regulations do not permit DX QSO's from the USA. 73, Zack W9SZ ____________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00058.html (8,374 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW question (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:04:24 EDT; the 11m contesters may get a bit upset at that. They already have their own contests, dxcc awards, spotting network, dx-peditions, iota awards, etc. they might be a bit upset if we move in on their t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00059.html (7,829 bytes)
7. RE: [CQ-Contest] CQWW question (score: 1): Author: "N2TK" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:38:53 -0400; Gee Dave, I might have to take a CB rig with me when I head to the Caribbean so that I can play in more than one contest - hi. N2TK, Tony not the 11m contesters may get a bit upset at that. They alre; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00060.html (9,468 bytes)
8. RE: [CQ-Contest] CQWW question (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:03:58 -0500 (CDT); Fair trade. They have been invading our 10 meter band, mostly in the CW section, with their SSB. :-] 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00061.html (8,393 bytes)
9. RE: [CQ-Contest] CQWW question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Jones" <steve@rjtraining.fsnet.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 21:31:25 +0100; Oh dear, I guess the usa stations I have worked earlier this year on 60m were not legal then? :-) My special licence permit refers to it being granted for experimenting in near inter uk near vertical; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00067.html (9,688 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]