- 1. [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Category (score: 1)
- Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:01:00 -0500
- Those of you that think this whole thing is OK should look up the words sportsmanship in the dictionary. Contesting is more than just having the highest score. Acting in a respectful manner towards y
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00209.html (7,652 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Category (score: 1)
- Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:31:46 -0600
- Jeff, Massaging your entry to attempt to qualify for an easier category you don't is unethical. Entering a TOUGHER category than you operated? Why is that even an issue? If you start a contest in hig
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00218.html (9,510 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Category (score: 1)
- Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 21:54:21 -0700
- I run One Alpha in Field day all the time from home. That was when I still had an Alpha Amp. I guess that was unethical. I of course never submitted a log and it is not a contest, cough cough. With a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00280.html (8,172 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu