Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CT\-17\s+Problem\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CT-17 Problem (score: 1)
Author: <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 9:41:29 -0400
I just purchased a used CT-17 CIV converter for my IC756PRO. I can't seem to get it working. It didn't come with an instruction manual or any of the cables. I happened to find a .pdf of the manual on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00057.html (7,910 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT-17 Problem (score: 1)
Author: MikeR <nf4l@nf4l.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 20:45:05 -0400
Jeff - Is the address set correctly in the software? I don't know what it is for the 756Pro, the ProII is 64 hex. There's nothing special about the cable. 73, Mike NF4L ______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00061.html (9,083 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT-17 Problem (score: 1)
Author: 7L4IOU <ncb02761@nifty.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:49:40 +0900
Hi I think that CT-17 is working. It is difficult to measure the pulse by Volt meter. If it is not 0V and unsteady, it will be good. As for CI-V of ICOM, it is important to synchronize an CI-V Addres
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00062.html (9,499 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT-17 Problem (score: 1)
Author: Hisami Dejima <7L4IOU@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:41:54 +0900
Hi I think that CT-17 is working. It is difficult to measure the pulse by Volt meter. If it is not 0V and unsteady, it will be good. As for CI-V of ICOM, it is important to synchronize an CI-V Addres
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00063.html (9,500 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT-17 Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Mirko Sibilja" <s57ad@amis.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 10:50:46 +0200
Just a dumb question - did you set radio receiver address? 73! Mirko, S57AD -- Original Message -- From: <ku8e@bellsouth.net> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com> Cc: <secc@contesting.com>; <mrrc@contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00065.html (9,247 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT-17 Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Wagner" <tfwagner@snet.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 07:07:16 -0400
There are two standard serial cables. One is a "straight-through" cable, the other is a "modem eliminator" cable. You want the former. You can use your multimeter to see if you have continuity on all
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00066.html (10,831 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT-17 Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:58:25 -0000
Jeff It may be necessary to set transceive on or off ( try both!) in the set menu, and it might be necessary to set poll to off in the logging software. Took me a while to get mine going. 73 Clive GW
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00067.html (9,312 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT-17 Problem (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 20:59:13 +0000
Might be easier to prove KU8E's new CT-17 is working... Disconnect CT-17 from everything but computer. Fire up computer with terminal program, talking to COM port CT-17 is connected to. Turn "echo of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00071.html (8,784 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu