Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CT\s+and\s+7QP\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CT\s+and\s+7QP\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT and 7QP? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:06:28 -0700; Why not go to www.n1mm.com and download n1mm logger. It has the module with correct scoring for the 7QP. No kluge's or hassles. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00264.html (7,079 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT and 7QP? (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:30:42 -0700; I'm missing something here , Doesn't the W7 have to copy all those goofey exchanges from WAKSP to WYTET plus NE NH AND MS ?? A big bunch of those are going to require 5 letter spaces and will CT hand; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00267.html (8,629 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT and 7QP? (score: 1): Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:36:24 +0100; SD V13.01 supports both sides of the 7QP, on the 6 HF bands, with correct scoring and multiplier identification. SD runs on any Windows PC, and is free from www.ei5di.com/sd/sdsetup.exe. If you've no; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00268.html (7,898 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT and 7QP? (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 18:10:36 -0000; W7 stations are not required to log the county name because there are no extra points for W7's to work W7 counties. W7's only get State credit. I came up with the workaround in CT for the die-hard CT; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00275.html (10,153 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT and 7QP? (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@hughes.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:50:07 -0400; I sure hope that isn't true. In a contest, a completed exchange means that both stations copy the callsigns and the full exchange. Contesters should never assume it isn't necessary to copy part of th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00279.html (9,692 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT and 7QP? (score: 1): Author: BobK8IA@aol.com; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:27:31 EDT; To presume that stations in the 7th call area do not have to copy the state/county of others in W7 is not a good plan unless the sponsors have specifically said it isn't required - in a quick look I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00280.html (6,672 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT and 7QP? (score: 1): Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 22:24:23 +0100; For what it's worth, when I was asked to update SD to support 7QP, I replied with the following question. Is it OK for 7-area stations to record only the state from other 7-area stations, or must th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00281.html (7,672 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT and 7QP? (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 18:48:35 -0700; I didn't read anywhere that I didn't have to copy counties for W7's I did read however I can work him in a different count and get another Q for the score. and on county lines I log him twice , If I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00289.html (11,770 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]