- 21. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:19:37 -0400
- Pardon the soapbox... What many people overlook is that the N1MM Logger project is taking a qualitatively different approach to software development, in the effort to rapidly evolve the software to m
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00369.html (11,377 bytes)
- 22. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1)
- Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:31:17 -0600
- Personally, I will not upgrade to a new vesion a week prior to a contest unless the new version addresses a specific issue that I was having an issue with or a feature I wanted. Many serious operator
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00373.html (12,403 bytes)
- 23. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM (score: 1)
- Author: "dsthill" <dsthill@cbcbarbados.bb>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:41:11 -0400
- Guys It could be said that this is not an accurate stat. Essentially of the freeware loggers, SDI and N1MM can be said to be tops. Of paid-for loggers, Writelog is tops. What might also be interestin
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00382.html (10,899 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu