- 1. [CQ-Contest] CW Call Signs ... the SMOOTH & PERFECT ... (score: 1)
- Author: utahfolk@xmission.com (utahfolk)
- Date: Thu May 16 02:31:53 2002
- Well with the "dit dit dit" series of egrams on the reflector I will offer my comments after having callsigns ending in HS and KK ... for too many decades .... Studying the issue I concluded that the
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00177.html (7,928 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] CW Call Signs ... the SMOOTH & PERFECT ... (score: 1)
- Author: john-k1rc@juno.com (john-k1rc@juno.com)
- Date: Thu May 16 10:31:35 2002
- Another (CW) tip for the people who have calls that dont flow as smooth as they want; Send your c/s at different speeds and find out what speed(s) (+/- a couple of WPM) where you have a minimum of re
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00182.html (10,263 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] CW Call Signs ... the SMOOTH & PERFECT ... (score: 1)
- Author: w4au@contesting.com (John Unger)
- Date: Fri May 17 11:39:50 2002
- In addition to making sure the letters in the the suffix of your callsign at least minimize the possibilities of being mis-copied, there is also the "rhythm factor" that I believe helps copy calls be
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00193.html (7,292 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu