Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+SS\s+Error\s+Report\s+Error\s+Report\s+\-\s+K6LA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+SS\s+Error\s+Report\s+Error\s+Report\s+\-\s+K6LA\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CW SS Error Report Error Report - K6LA (score: 1): Author: KWIDELITZ@delphi.com (KWIDELITZ@delphi.com); Date: Sun May 3 18:31:27 1998; I've got good news and bad news regarding the log checking in the 1997 CW Sweepstakes. The good news is you can get your error list from Billy Lunt at ARRL. The bad news is that in 13 of 30 QSOs mark; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-05/msg00020.html (10,493 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] CW SS Error Report Error Report - K6LA (score: 1): Author: Ve3bmv@aol.com (Ve3bmv); Date: Mon May 4 11:32:55 1998; << The point of this missive is to state that as much as I want tight log checking and the benefit of learning from my errors, there has to be a feedback loop to reduce error checking errors. The onl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-05/msg00027.html (8,714 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] CW SS Error Report Error Report - K6LA (score: 1): Author: n6ig@netcom.com (Jim Pratt); Date: Tue May 5 10:39:20 1998; Ken, welcome to the club! As many astute readers of this reflector will recall, I went down a similar road a couple of years ago. However, there was one distinct difference: two of the top ten statio; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-05/msg00044.html (9,826 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]