Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+Skimmer\s+in\s+NAQP\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer in NAQP? (score: 1)
Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:52:30 -0800 (PST)
The January NAQP is coming up soon. I notice that skimmer use (within one's own station) is now allowed for single ops. I don't remember that in the rules before...I am surprised there have been no c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00295.html (7,083 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer in NAQP? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:49:45 -0700
Yeah, the RTTY Roundup is starting to look like a better option for that weekend (: . Many thanks to NAQP Manager, WA7BNM. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00296.html (7,370 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer in NAQP? (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:47:00 +0000
That is because they aren't allowing it for spotting information, only for copying the code like any other code reader would in making contacts. Everyone should probably make note of 2 common mistake
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00297.html (9,519 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer in NAQP? (score: 1)
Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:14:09 -0800 (PST)
"Access to spotting information obtained directly or indirectly from any source other than the station operator, such as from other stations or automated tools, is prohibited, except as follows: Tech
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00299.html (12,406 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer in NAQP? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:51:21 -0800
I used Skimmer for the first time in the RAC contest this past weekend. It was loaded with busted callsigns! I saw 2 and sometimes 3 wrong calls on the same frequency. Seems like some have mentioned
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00300.html (8,298 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer in NAQP? (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:29:58 -0600
Other than the good effect it has on penalizing those that blindly use it to work people and NOT do the actual copy of the call to learn who they are working. Let these lazy people keep working all t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00302.html (9,371 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer in NAQP? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry - K7SV" <k7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:40:16 -0500
"Yeah, the RTTY Roundup is starting to look like a better option for that weekend" I think Steve N2IC expressed my sentiments with his comment. While I normally prefer CW contests, I think that joini
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00342.html (7,095 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer in NAQP? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:54:45 -0500
Lest there be any doubt, unless/until NAQP CW has an Assisted category, I totally agree that use of CW Skimmer should not be allowed. I think there is plenty of room in our little world for both Assi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00345.html (8,825 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu