Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+Skimmer\s+is\s+a\s+crutch\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+Skimmer\s+is\s+a\s+crutch\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer is a crutch (score: 1): Author: "Paul Mackanos - K2DB" <k2db@k2db.org>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:24:23 -0400; I guess if you want to register it at $75.00 and find out it is slower than your brain, go for it. I downloaded it, looked at it, commented that it was neat, un-installed it. Any CW decoder is slower; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00509.html (8,055 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer is a crutch (score: 1): Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:15:33 -0500; Paul, As many have pointed out, we have had CW decoders for a long time. I have great respect for those who, for whatever reason, cannot operate CW themselves; but instead, they endure the slowness o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00533.html (10,162 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]