Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+Speed\s+in\s+Sweepstakes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+Speed\s+in\s+Sweepstakes\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CW Speed in Sweepstakes (score: 1): Author: Bill <Bill@ng3k.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:03:42 -0500 (EST); According to Skimmer, I was CQing at an average speed of 25 WPM during Sweepstakes. Most callers answered at or near my calling speed. But, a not insignificant subset responded nearer 35 WPM, includi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00169.html (8,351 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Speed in Sweepstakes (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:29:43 -0500; Frankly, I found it much more common for people CQing at any moderate speed to be unable actually to handle information at that speed, so I tended to slow down *at least* to the CQing station's speed; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00185.html (9,532 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Speed in Sweepstakes (score: 1): Author: Timothy Coker <n6win73@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:35:50 -0800; I get the same response throughout the contests. I can't head copy past 25-28 wpm... so I run at 22-25 wpm. Most guys will call in at around 25 wpm and I do ok at making it through the QSO without me; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00186.html (9,724 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Speed in Sweepstakes (score: 1): Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:16:10 -0500; Interesting discussion. I CQ'd most of the contest at 32 wpm, with bursts of up to 36 or 38 wpm when I had big pileups. In general, I was never asked for fills. I did have guys who called me at the s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00194.html (12,026 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Speed in Sweepstakes (score: 1): Author: "Jack/W6NF" <vhfplus@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:27:08 -0800; The skimmers showed me running 21-23 wpm...pretty accurate. When called by someone at a slower speed I *always* slow down, in one case to 14wpm...easy to do with N1MM Logger. In that case the station; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00199.html (11,486 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] CW Speed in Sweepstakes (score: 1): Author: Art Hambleton <ahambleton@cellularspecialties.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:47:34 -0500; What a coincidence. Yesterday I checked the RBN to see if W1VE ever slowed down his speed under 30 wpm during SS. I compared myself, W1VE, K1RX and K5ZD. I have always noticed Randy will slow down in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00201.html (8,002 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Speed in Sweepstakes (score: 1): Author: Mike DeChristopher <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:53:31 -0500; I noticed this year, more than ever, CW speed seemed to be an issue. Of course, I haven't made a serious SS attempt since my Colorado days, but I digress... W4** CQ at 35wpm. Yes, 35wpm. I called him; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00202.html (15,238 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Speed in Sweepstakes (score: 1): Author: Timothy Coker <n6win73@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:39:23 -0800; I envy the guys running at 30+ who by and large make the high rate with their abilities. It reminds me to continue working hard. I believe the only wrong thing occurring is when an op will not QRS wh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00206.html (14,751 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Speed in Sweepstakes (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:43:28 -0600; Sadly this has all but become forgotten. It was a Standard Operating Procedure as an Old novice days. You send at the speed you want people to reply to you at. And when you call someone you call them; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00223.html (16,455 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]