Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+Sweepstakes\s+Then\s+and\s+Now\s+\(Long\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CW Sweepstakes Then and Now (Long) (score: 1)
Author: "Hal Offutt" <hal@japancorporateresearch.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:35:58 -0400
CW Sweepstakes Then and Now Comparing the 1958 and 2007 CW SS Contests By Hal Offutt, W1NN Heavy Reading Some 10 or 15 years ago I had the opportunity to acquire a huge quantity of old QST magazines
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00252.html (20,183 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Sweepstakes Then and Now (Long) (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:50:38 -0600
Wow, Hal, that is a mighty fine piece of analysis. I'm impressed. Now if we could find a way to turn the tide a bit.... I'm planning to do my part and be on from here, with as much antenna as I can f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00257.html (7,765 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Sweepstakes Then and Now (Long) (score: 1)
Author: "Warren C. Stankiewicz" <nf1j@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:16:16 -0700
Nice job, Hal, but I'm not sure I *completely* agree with your methodology. For one thing, the true indicator of activity in SS (although the ARRL itself never looks at it that way) is the QSO counts
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00261.html (8,893 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Sweepstakes Then and Now (Long) (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:24:21 -0800
Wonderful article Hal. I suspect one big difference between SS CW in 1958 and today is the change in the National Traffic System. I was first licensed in 1973 and was always in love with CW. In the l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00267.html (26,928 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Sweepstakes Then and Now (Long) (score: 1)
Author: mike l dol dormann <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:02:11 -0800
There are a few of us who stopped advancing our station technology somewhere in the 1950s. I watched W7VKZ work 1953 SS CW with an ARC5 tx and an NC100 rx and thought ham radio is for me. On 40m i st
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00272.html (8,459 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] CW Sweepstakes Then and Now (Long) (score: 1)
Author: scott mcmullen <scottamcmullen@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
This is an interesting thread and analysis. It looks as if Phone Sweepstakes surpassed CW Sweepstakes in the mid/late 70's. CW Ph 1973 1086 1080 1974 1224 1177 1975 1152 1147 1976 < entry totals by m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00287.html (7,066 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Sweepstakes Then and Now (Long) (score: 1)
Author: Ken Claerbout <kclaerbo@bbg.gov>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:01:07 -0400
Since we are taking a look back, allow me to mention that the Potomac Valley Radio Club (PVRC) will be airing the calls of two founding members, W3GRF & W4KFC, in both modes of Sweepstakes as part of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00289.html (7,955 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Sweepstakes Then and Now (Long) (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:31:30 -0400
Three things to consider about the SS in 1958: 1. You had to pick the best 40 hours out of a total of 73. 2. CW and phone ran at the same time so you had to pick your mode. 3. There was a QSO multipi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00301.html (7,830 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu