Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+VS\.\s+PHONE\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+VS\.\s+PHONE\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CW VS. PHONE (score: 1): Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:49:51 -0500; CW is NOT a sub-band; phone is. CW is allowed everywhere on the ham bands below 30MHz; phone is restricted, usually starting 100kHz up (and outside of the USA usually by gentlemen's agreements [de fa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00181.html (8,016 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW VS. PHONE (score: 1): Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:37:05 -0500; I don't think there will or needs to be any change in the phone bands. Both parts of bands get crowded at times (contests mainly). I think the problems with phone in the "wrong" places will go away l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00206.html (9,886 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]