Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+WW\s+RTTY\s+Complaint\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+WW\s+RTTY\s+Complaint\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CW WW RTTY Complaint (score: 1): Author: kx9x@juno.com (kx9x@juno.com); Date: Mon Sep 29 22:36:23 1997; Hey, everybody I got this note from an extremely disgruntled ham. Anybody else get this lovely comment? Callsign omitted to protect the "innocent:" Am I the only victim of this person's tirade? 73, S; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00257.html (9,212 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] CW WW RTTY Complaint (score: 1): Author: n9thc@FoxValley.net (Rick Andren); Date: Tue Sep 30 05:24:26 1997; Lots of people received this mail Sean. I wouldn't take it too seriously. Ya gotta figure there's always one person dissatisfied with something. Diddle on... Rick Andren - N9THC n9thc@foxvalley.net a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00259.html (6,728 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] CW WW RTTY Complaint (score: 1): Author: javier@kjsl.com (Javier Henderson); Date: Mon Sep 29 22:30:58 1997; (sour comments from some lid deleted) I've been hearing things like these since the day I was licensed, 23 years ago. Live and let live, -jav, n6vbg/lu1bui -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00260.html (6,883 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] CW WW RTTY Complaint (score: 1): Author: rocker@datasync.com (Ray Rocker); Date: Tue Sep 30 02:09:41 1997; ^^^^^^ I, for one, think the above gem deserves to be immortalized in a signature, or at least on a web page. -- Ray, WQ5L -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00261.html (6,939 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] CW WW RTTY Complaint (score: 1): Author: desmith@Telalink.Net (Doug Smith); Date: Wed Oct 1 12:40:04 1997; The tone is rather abrasive & the spelling could use some help but... to some degree, the complainant has a point.. as it does appear many of the RTTY operators were *not* listening before transmitt; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00008.html (8,399 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] CW WW RTTY Complaint (score: 1): Author: jholly@cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback); Date: Wed Oct 1 15:50:58 1997; 7040 is the RTTY DX window. Europe and Asia can't work RTTY above 7055. Hence the CQ'ing around 7040. Couple times a year we're going to be there. Last full weekend in Sept. 73, Jim, WA6SDM -- CQ-Con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00011.html (8,126 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] CW WW RTTY Complaint (score: 1): Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor); Date: Wed Oct 1 19:44:13 1997; Except that then you may be stomping on Canadian and DX SSB ops. Either way, TX B4 RX will get you honours status at Lids U. 73, ve4xt -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Adm; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00019.html (7,797 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] CW WW RTTY Complaint (score: 1): Author: w5hvv@aeneas.net (Rod Fitz-Randolph); Date: Thu Oct 2 00:04:01 1997; ______________________________________________________________________________ I certainly wasn't aware of that. I think that most individuals that engage in QRP aren't aware of that. Will be on the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00023.html (7,446 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]