Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Ca\s+QSO\s+Sad\s+\:\(\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Ca QSO Sad :( (score: 1)
Author: <fhdez@vox-tel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:09:12 -0400
Guys, Today I made the decision of operating the CA qso party, that all my friends seem to like so much and guess what I found out? Puerto Rico is not a mult for Californians! But KL7 , KH6 are.. als
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00280.html (7,329 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ca QSO Sad :( (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Makins" <tim.ei8ic@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 07:36:36 +0100
Perhaps if you guys had voted to become a state in December '98 things would be different !! 73s Tim EI8IC http://www.mapability.com/ei8ic/ Ham Map Heaven. Contester Resources. Free zone maps, and co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00284.html (8,152 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ca QSO Sad :( (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:14:36 -0400
Felipe, Sorry to hear about this, but there's a simple solution. Wait one week. Then operate in the 48th Annual PENNSYLVANIA QSO Party. KP4 IS a multiplier in PaQP, and it's always a tough one to wor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00291.html (8,017 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ca QSO Sad :( (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:10:12 -0000
California QSO party has 2 really bad rules: The first one being the requirement for CA stations to copy counties in CA when they don't count for points for CA stations. The second is the rule about
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00293.html (9,948 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ca QSO Sad :( (score: 1)
Author: <fhdez@vox-tel.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:34:06 -0400
Thanks ron! Felipe Felipe, Sorry to hear about this, but there's a simple solution. Wait one week. Then operate in the 48th Annual PENNSYLVANIA QSO Party. KP4 IS a multiplier in PaQP, and it's always
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00294.html (9,322 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ca QSO Sad :( (score: 1)
Author: "Andrew Faber" <andrew.faber@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:26:23 -0700
Mal, I hope you'll reconsider and join the thousands of stations that will participate in CQP this weekend. It's a great contest, and we'd certainly like you to be in it. Regarding your points, certa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00304.html (12,699 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Ca QSO Sad :( (score: 1)
Author: "Seifert Msgt James E" <james.seifert@usmc.mil>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:25:30 -0700
I would also speculate that since there are 58 counties in CA and that is the number of multipliers for out of state hams, then they try to make that exact same amount of multipliers for in state ham
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00309.html (7,219 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu