- 1. [CQ-Contest] Calling The Kettle Black (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Rosenberg <wd3q@starpower.net>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:58:59 -0500
- This discussion has been passionate, if nothing else. What I find so fascinating is the apparent timidity of the so called contesting "Big Guns", most of whom have been silent. Early on in this threa
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00221.html (7,648 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Calling The Kettle Black (score: 1)
- Author: k3bu@optonline.net
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:14:48 +0000 (GMT)
- Because reflector administrators are supressing/confiscating replies/postings. They confiscated three of mine. WHY!!!??? Yuri K3BU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00225.html (7,495 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Calling The Kettle Black (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Scace K3NA <eric@k3na.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:47:02 -0500
- In a past contest years ago, I sent information about a rules violation to the contest sponsor. Nothing was heard back, and as far as I knew nothing was done about it. That doesn't encourage self-enf
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00227.html (9,378 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Calling The Kettle Black (score: 1)
- Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:07:27 -0800
- Talk about a passionate discussion! However, it is significantly healthier than non-responsive apathy which leads to zip squat. Self-enforcement via direct confrontation and communication of concrete
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00253.html (10,353 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu