- 1. [CQ-Contest] Casual contesting... (score: 1)
- Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson)
- Date: Tue Mar 20 21:31:29 2001
- I've received many comments to my notion that the results need to be published. I falsely assumed the ARRL publishes scores. They do, only to members--both printed and on the web. As an ARRL member,
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00284.html (8,797 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Casual contesting... (score: 1)
- Author: frenaye@pcnet.com (Tom Frenaye)
- Date: Wed Mar 21 00:34:40 2001
- Not accurate. ARRL contest results going back to January 1997 are published on-line and available to anyone at: http://www.arrl.org/contests/results/ ARRL members can see the most recent results on-l
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00285.html (7,716 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Casual contesting... (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Wed Mar 21 07:43:56 2001
- Ford raises many interesting questions. Let me just concentrate on one. Would it be a violation of CQ's copyright if someone were to buy a copy and then, perhaps 6 months later, transcribe the result
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00290.html (7,529 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Casual contesting... (score: 1)
- Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson)
- Date: Wed Mar 21 11:10:23 2001
- I received a private correspondence from Dave K4JRB, CQ 160 Contests Director. He has convinced me that I should subscribe to CQ. OK, I'll try it. and later: OK, I'll stand corrected on several point
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00291.html (8,310 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] Casual contesting... (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Wed Mar 21 07:43:56 2001
- Ford raises many interesting questions. Let me just concentrate on one. Would it be a violation of CQ's copyright if someone were to buy a copy and then, perhaps 6 months later, transcribe the result
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00385.html (7,522 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu