Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Check\s+\#\s+in\s+SS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Check\s+\#\s+in\s+SS\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Check # in SS (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:35:40 -0500; Now this is interesting. I asked the below statement in another group. And did not get the answer I was expecting for sure. Lets see what I get here. Not to start up the controversy again of using a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00063.html (7,857 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check # in SS (score: 1): Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>; Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 21:02:23 -0400; What is the most efficient to use? If you would like an off hand, outside observer kind of response, 1 - I maintain that all CW Qs and exchange info be no faster than 25 WPM at all times. This would; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00067.html (7,990 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]