Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Check\s+in\s+SS\s*$/: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check in SS (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Reagan" <mreagan@preciscom.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:58:41 -0700
I agree with Stu..I am looking forward to the day when my check is one of the oldest none club checks in the contest!!! Mike Reagan NI7T Price, Utah http://www.preciscom.net/ni7t were after _________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00413.html (9,866 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check in SS (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:10:39 -0000
Just hope that by Operating that long you don't have to check last year's log to see what you sent in that one or for that matter check yesterdays Log to see what you sent. Of corse you get to work a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00419.html (11,167 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check in SS (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:00:18 -0600
Can we please stop pickin' the pepper on this? We've heard from the ONLY entity whose opinion matters: the contest sponsor. The contest sponsor's interpretation of the rule is that you pick a check a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00421.html (10,608 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check in SS (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <kc1f@adelphia.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:13:41 -0500
What part of this is ambiguous ? I shall feel free to twist other ARRL contest rules for my own benefit in the future, now that I know that the contest community permits and condones it.. Stu KC1F _
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00424.html (8,327 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check in SS (score: 1)
Author: "James Cain" <cainjim@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 08:20:12 -0500
Are we having fun yet? The rule is ambiguous. "Licensed" as or to do what? Drive a car? Practice medicine? Fix plumbing? Write poetry? K1TN/9 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00429.html (9,250 bytes)

26. [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:54:55 -0500
Why are so many putting so much emphasis on the CK, as anything more than a "randomly chosen two digit number that is consistently used throughout the contest", having absolutely no relation to anyth
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00095.html (7,714 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 08:51:43 -0700
I think most people try to use their actual year licensed. That would be a good question to ask on the entry form.   What year were you licensed.  It think we all know that new hams are hard to come
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00117.html (8,703 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 12:19:03 -0500
At one point I thought it was 1998. Then I looked back at my actual license document which I found in a drawer (partly handwritten with bureaucrat's stamp and customs receipt) and it was October 31,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00120.html (9,968 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 13:37:24 -0600
What is the point of the ARRL stating in the rules that the check is the year first licensed, if they really don't care what you send? 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00132.html (9,816 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 14:32:16 -0700
Because the ARRL can interpret their rules they way they want to and they have numerous statements that is doesn't really matter. They could change the rules but why when they can ignore them if they
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00136.html (10,940 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 16:34:31 -0500
The point of the check is to send a somewhat unique (to you) piece of information, emulating part of the old traffic message format that the SS exchange derived from. It has to be on the honor system
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00138.html (12,403 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 16:53:19 -0500
John: It is still the rule. Policy is they do not check. Policy can change at any time. I agree with Ria -- copy what is sent, and you did the correct thing. --Mike, WV2ZOW __________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00139.html (11,345 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 16:04:18 -0600
I agree completely with you and Ria. What I don't agree with are those who purposely do not follow this rule for one reason or another-sending a number that they know isn't the year that they were fi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00143.html (12,203 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 17:45:41 -0600
I think it is the same for many contests - tradition. 73, Keith NM5G --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of John Geiger Sent: Wednesday, Novembe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00144.html (11,245 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: Mike/W5JR <w5jr.lists@att.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 19:17:24 -0500
Sounds like everyone is going to be sending "55" next year. tnx Mike / W5JR Alpharetta GA sent via my HP95LX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00148.html (11,116 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 20:15:36 -0700
This discussion has been going on now for what as long at the CQ-Contest reflector has been around and yet most people still send their check right. Just copy what is sent and move on.  The data sent
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00151.html (12,069 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 21:02:29 -0800
Mikes right. FFS, the League, which is the FINAL arbiter of all things ruleswise, has said it doesnt matter, as long as people copy what you send.. Ergo, it DOESNT MATTER. Copy what is sent, move on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00155.html (13,896 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 07:41:36 -0600
How would you know, anyway? You could look back through my records and maybe find that I've had the W9SZ call since 1977. But you wouldn't be able to easily find the call I had before that. Or when I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00161.html (17,504 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 07:59:26 -0600
As the coordinator of a contest, I take exception to your negative comments on rules. To me, rules are written as guidelines to contesters. It is a rare occurrence when contesters protest rules, and/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00163.html (12,763 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 08:05:10 -0700
Not to mention the cases of multi ops, people that can't remember exactly etc. People using whatever they want for a check has zero impact on the contest. As the competitor copy what is sent and log
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00170.html (17,618 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu