Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Check\s+of\s+00\,\s+a\s+disadvantage\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Check\s+of\s+00\,\s+a\s+disadvantage\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Check of 00, a disadvantage? (score: 1): Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 12:31:16 -0500; On a SS check of 00, zero zero, being a disadvantage, I see it kind of the opposite, as an advantage, because all those dahs, what I call "dah heavy" is easier to understand that a lot of dits or som; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00279.html (8,312 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check of 00, a disadvantage? (score: 1): Author: "D K7GK" <k7gk@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:48:59 -0800; That's an interesting opinion, Richard. I do get asked quite a bit for a fill on my check, more often than on the number. I think Doug, W9WI, may be right on: I appreciate all the suggestions. I gue; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00292.html (8,532 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check of 00, a disadvantage? (score: 1): Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:00:02 -0500; My only problem with the 00, 01, 02, etc. checks were that I would absent mindedly treat the 0 as a leading zero and not type it in the log thus causing the qso to not save because of an error in the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00294.html (10,427 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check of 00, a disadvantage? (score: 1): Author: <ku8e@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:48:29 -0500; I remember working W1MX (I think) as my first contact and he gives me a check of "08". 08 ?? That can't be right it's not 2008 yet... So I ask for a repeat thinking he sent 08 by mistake. I copy it a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00410.html (7,970 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check of 00, a disadvantage? (score: 1): Author: K4RO Kirk Pickering <k4ro@k4ro.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:02:55 -0600; My check is also 76, and I used to have the same problem in SS. It is almost as bad as my name on phone NAQP, which is lousy. The last two years of SS, I ran at a slightly lower average CW speed (31; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00418.html (8,319 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]