Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Click\,\s+click\,\s+click\.\.\.\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Thu Feb 22 19:13:47 2001
The key clicks seem to be getting worse and worse. This year in the CQ 160 contest, there was one station who could be heard most of 5KC with his FT1000D. Several others using Yaesu radios were also
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00146.html (8,807 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: olinger@bellsouth.net (Guy Olinger)
Date: Thu Feb 22 21:35:18 2001
Think probably has a good deal less to do with the exciter than how the amplifier is driven. Particularly those amps that need only 65 watts to drive it to 1.5 kW. The loading needs to be backed off
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00147.html (10,525 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com)
Date: Thu Feb 22 22:00:05 2001
After using the new Timewave filter at K5KG's QTH last weekend, most loud signals appeared to have clicks. It was very annoying. I don't notice the same phenomena on my 'MP with INRAD filters. Is it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00148.html (8,389 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Thu Feb 22 22:04:41 2001
I might suggest this is more a phenomena of signals being loud in Florida and weak in western W7. 73 Bill -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00149.html (8,757 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: ve3bbh@interlog.com (Paul, VE3ZT)
Date: Thu Feb 22 22:11:48 2001
I agree with you, Bill. Have noticed same thing re lots of clicks on the bands during contests, thought it was just me, though. I run my MP with about 15-20 db of Attentuation, i.e., helps me when wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00150.html (9,751 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Fri Feb 23 03:07:30 2001
I think it's more likely that the MP receiver can't handle lots of strong signals in the wide passband of the early stages. This could be true of other "state-of-the-art" radios, too. Up until this w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00153.html (9,550 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@akorn.net (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri Feb 23 07:03:04 2001
Hi Bill and all, I've been watching this for a while and keeping a list, and it isn't just the MP's that are problematic. The 775DSP's are particularly bad for spurious signals, thumps, and clicks. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00154.html (10,418 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: n7tr@rnodx.org (Rich Hallman - N7TR)
Date: Fri Feb 23 07:15:05 2001
Are there any reports of this type of Receiver issue in the new FT-1000MP Mark 5? Thanks... Rich I think it's more likely that the MP receiver can't handle lots of strong signals in the wide passband
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00158.html (11,661 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: clive_whelan@btinternet.com (Clive Whelan)
Date: Fri Feb 23 19:46:41 2001
Unless you have a malfunction, your MP is clean, check the Radcom and QST reviews. Either way you cannot, unfortunately, alter the keying characteristics of the MP( et al) the way you used to be able
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00160.html (8,854 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri Feb 23 20:25:35 2001
Hi Dick and all, If this is too long, skip to the end. I have a constructive suggestion that might be fun and educational. Most radios fall apart somewhat at close spacing. The ARRL announced on the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00165.html (12,633 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Sat Feb 24 20:28:47 2001
Hi Clive, I hate to bring bad news, but..... I have no idea what RADCOM measures, but QST reviews do not measure CW bandwidth.... nor do they measure SSB bandwidth with valid modulation envelopes. Pr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00172.html (10,415 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: otterstad@enter.vg (ragnar otterstad)
Date: Sun Feb 25 08:24:59 2001
M Adding less than $1 worth of parts I significantly improved the closespaced performance of my FT-1000D. It seems design-care rather than cost is behind less than state-ofthe-art performance. TOM :
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00176.html (8,041 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun Feb 25 10:21:28 2001
I guess I'm missing something. According to the Handbook, key clicks are a consequence of the rise and fall times of the transmitter's output, and that the tailoring of these times is a design choice
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00177.html (9,473 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Sun Feb 25 11:13:04 2001
The "clicks" are not necessarily related to problems with they keying waveform in some "modern" transceivers. If their synthesizers do not stabilize BEFORE the production of RF (a very real possibil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00178.html (8,881 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun Feb 25 12:57:30 2001
Would it be feasible to use the same test setup that ARRL uses for composite noise, but key the transceiver at a standard rate, both with and without a standard transmit/receive offset, and look for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00183.html (9,767 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Sun Feb 25 16:45:20 2001
Would it be feasible to use the same test setup that ARRL uses for The problem is to measure bandwidth the analyzer must have a much narrower filter than the bandwidth you are looking at. So if you w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00193.html (10,453 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu