Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Clicks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Clicks\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Clicks (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon Jan 14 12:55:46 2002; Using a noise blanker is a bad idea, but you know with a simple design change we COULD use our blankers with overload problems....but that is for another day. After some more thought, I revisited th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00331.html (8,530 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Clicks (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Wed Mar 7 07:51:36 2001; Reading this statement made me uncomfortable at the start. If cranking in attenuator makes the clicks go away, then I would wonder whether they are being produced in the receiver. I know that my TS-9; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00097.html (8,834 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Clicks (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: Wed Mar 7 10:54:38 2001; I thought JD liked that! I wish the "clicks" survey was a little more complete...like how many people with FT1000's did NOT have the problem? I've been using a TS-940 and an ARD230 amp (yup, 11+ year; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00106.html (8,542 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Clicks (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Wed Mar 7 15:44:32 2001; Set up a spectrum analyzer to look at the output of a transceiver through a suitable attenuator. Set the transceiver to full output, full QSK and key it at 30 wpm, all dots. The analyzer should sweep; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00109.html (9,678 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Clicks (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu Mar 8 01:28:50 2001; In other N0AX rigs, Very good question. The ARRL Handbook points out that there is a correlation between the rise/fall times of the RF envelope, CW speed and intelligibility, with some degree of "har; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00115.html (8,705 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Clicks (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it); Date: Thu Mar 8 16:15:46 2001; f28FEPW20980 Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/cq-contest X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C When measuring THD we don't care much wh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00120.html (8,798 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Clicks (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it); Date: Thu Mar 8 15:00:18 2001; f28DwvW19098 Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/cq-contest X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C I think the parameter to be measured is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00121.html (9,616 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Clicks (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu Mar 8 09:33:16 2001; Even for CW clicks? Also, some people have suggested that in modern radios this phenomenon may not be related to RF envelope rise-time, but rather to anomalous synthesizer behavior. Any thoughts abou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00122.html (7,439 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] Clicks (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Thu Mar 8 15:58:06 2001; The customary way of specifying spectral cleanliness is to create a "profile" of level vs. frequency. For an example, refer to the FCC specifications for EMI type-acceptance. The standard for spuriou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00131.html (9,668 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Clicks (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri Mar 9 00:33:45 2001; Hi Ward and all, There is no standard in dB for modulation products. Radios do not require type-acceptance, only external power amplifiers. The number everyone thinks of is for harmonics and problems; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00136.html (10,390 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] Clicks (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com (Jimk8mr@aol.com); Date: Fri Mar 9 09:27:56 2001; During the ARRL CW test I was probably the 10 meter button pusher at K8AZ, whose signal was among those listed among those original posting. Although the 10 meter position was not so equipped, the 15; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00140.html (7,558 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] Clicks (score: 1): Author: w2vjn@rosenet.net (George Cutsogeorge); Date: Sat Mar 17 15:24:33 2001; Agilent has done a marvelous job of animating the spectra of a square wave with various numbers of harmonics included at this site. http://www.educatorscorner.com/experiments/spectral/SpecAn2.shtml Y; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00252.html (7,616 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] Clicks (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun Mar 18 19:36:08 2001; We don't have to do waveshaping with a single pole R/C filter. It's easy to do it with multi-pole waveshaping. 73, Tom W8JI W8JI@contesting.com -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00255.html (7,172 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]