Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Clock\s+Hour\s+vs\s+QRate\s+Hour\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Clock\s+Hour\s+vs\s+QRate\s+Hour\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Clock Hour vs QRate Hour (score: 1): Author: Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:36:21 -0400 (GMT-04:00); There seems to be a perception that one of these is, in some way, more "pure" than the other. Why? What's the difference if you have a 400 hour from 0000z to 0059z, or a 400 hour from 0003z to 0102z; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00359.html (7,758 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Clock Hour vs QRate Hour (score: 1): Author: Juan Hidalgo EA8CAC <ea8cac@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:16:34 +0100; Hello Mike: As i understand it isn´t the same. You can work 400 from 0000z to 0059z but your rate can be higher in the first half hour after 0100z and you can have 420 from 0020z to 0120z and still h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00366.html (8,499 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Clock Hour vs QRate Hour (score: 1): Author: w5ov@w5ov.com; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:29:51 -0400; I don't think there's any purity one way or the other - it just makes clear what you're reporting. Some logging programs report the clock hour rates only in their summaries. Qrate reports both. _____; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00367.html (8,158 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]