Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cluster\s+Network\s+Improvement\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cluster\s+Network\s+Improvement\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Cluster Network Improvement (score: 1): Author: jpescatore@aol.com; Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 06:36:42 -0500; K1TTT said: "Same answer to all 3... the existing software and network implementation won't handle it. Remember, the existing network was derived from the rf packetcluster network where by law encryp; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00087.html (7,709 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cluster Network Improvement (score: 1): Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>; Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:36:44 +0000; There are several of them around already. Some clubs have limited access to some of their nodes and implemented their own filtering. That does not solve the packet pileup or enable stations to opt ou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00088.html (9,501 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Cluster Network Improvement (score: 1): Author: jpescatore@aol.com; Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:22:17 -0500; K1TTT said "There are several of them around already. Some clubs have limited access to some of their nodes and implemented their own filtering. That does not solve the packet pileup or enable statio; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00094.html (8,062 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]