- 1. [CQ-Contest] Clusters and Cheating (score: 1)
- Author: ve5cma@hotmail.com (Doug Richardson)
- Date: Sun Dec 7 06:20:32 1997
- One more word on clusters and cheating by single ops: I have been connected to a local cluster that provides a call sign look up reference. I'm kind of a casual operator, and try to log as many Qs as
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00131.html (7,732 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Clusters and Cheating (score: 1)
- Author: K4OJ@aol.com (K4OJ)
- Date: Sun Dec 7 22:21:38 1997
- << I think the discussion should stick to facts, and avoid conjecture. Log comparisons to the cluster log would be the best way to establish funny business. P.S.: Why cheat? It degrades the value of
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00146.html (6,774 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Clusters and Cheating (score: 1)
- Author: ve5cma@hotmail.com (Doug Richardson)
- Date: Sun Dec 7 06:20:32 1997
- One more word on clusters and cheating by single ops: I have been connected to a local cluster that provides a call sign look up reference. I'm kind of a casual operator, and try to log as many Qs as
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00532.html (7,747 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Clusters and Cheating (score: 1)
- Author: ve5cma@hotmail.com (Doug Richardson)
- Date: Sun Dec 7 06:20:32 1997
- One more word on clusters and cheating by single ops: I have been connected to a local cluster that provides a call sign look up reference. I'm kind of a casual operator, and try to log as many Qs as
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00568.html (7,722 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu