Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Congrats\s+to\s+Russian\s+DX\s+Contest\s+cracking\s+downcheating\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:56:19 -0700
If >Amateur< radiosport requires this level of micromanagement, then it is no longer "amateur" but some twisted Dali-esque parody of the hobby. 73, de Hans, K0HB/K7 "Just a Boy and His Radio" I wonde
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00093.html (9,394 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:33:42 +0100
No Harry, If that 10m high dipole is located on a 100m high hill above flat environment at 20m ASL with good ground conductivity that dipole will always outperform the dipol at 2000m ASL, especially
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00102.html (9,630 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:40:35 +0100
I donīt see the difference to a qro station running an Emtron DX-4 or OM-3500 at full output. And how will you know before the contest started what stations should be tracked as you describe? Most of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00104.html (10,531 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:33:32 -0700
I understand what you are trying to do and salute you for that. However, I don't think it's as easy as it might at first seem. Some things have already been mentioned, like location, near field, far
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00119.html (10,492 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:14:59 -0500
The Reverse Beacon Network spots and records signal strength of all stations that any of its contributors hears, and the data are retained indefinitely. For example, you can review all 1.7 million sp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00121.html (11,225 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:30:34 -0500
This kind of thing really does reinforce my thought that we should just go to a MMOG ("Massively Multiplayer Online Game"), at least for the CW contests. Someday, the technology will be there for pho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00124.html (10,648 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:33:37 -0500
Oh no. A contest that expects the whole world to have CAT of the rig (for the exact frequency). Does this mean that someone who logs on their PC with no rig control (or has an older rig with no CAT)
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00127.html (10,480 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: Jack Haverty <k3fiv@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:52:22 -0800
No need to imagine. It's already done - see: http://www.qsonet.com/ 73, /Jack de K3FIV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00131.html (9,132 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: Zoltan Szoke <ha5pp_zoli@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:26:13 -0800 (PST)
I think here is the time to combine the contest stations HFTAs with reversebeacon.net dB-info (signal strength) for power analyzing. Perhaps we will see something ... ;-) The future is for reversebea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00132.html (12,098 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: Art R8TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:41:40 +0500
Too much for what? I really doubt you can name a couple of calls who can pretend for top-three scores and whose stations do lack rig control. -- R8TX (ex RX9TX) http://r8tx.qrz.ru "I love those who y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00133.html (10,830 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 07:10:29 -0500
The awful part is that they seem to have gotten a lot of members (or maybe that list on the website is inflated by free trial users, whether or not they went on to become subscribers. 73, Pete N4ZR T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00134.html (10,363 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:30:36 +0000
Not so fast... For those of you who have never seen a skimmer operating, it does NOT give an absolute signal strength, it give an SNR value. Those can vary wildly based on the local noise, not to men
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00135.html (14,069 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Merrill, W5GN" <w5gn@mxg.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 07:46:07 -0600
How about this RBN report of 86 db SNR, with 100 watts and an Inverted L!!!! W3LPL EI/W5GN 1839.0 CQ 86 DB 30 WPM 0623Z 30 JAN N4ZR pointed out that that could have been a much stronger signal in the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00136.html (10,691 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:41:31 -0500
True, Dave, but I suspect that statistical analysis could be used, derived from very many observations over the course of a contest, to establish a high probability that a station was running 10 dB m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00139.html (15,900 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:37:46 -0600
To translate SNR into absolute signal level it would be relatively straightforward and inexpensive to inject a signal into the receiver's front end from a calibrated signal source - say, -20 dBm - a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00142.html (7,756 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: Brooke Allen <brooke.t.allen@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:57:47 +0100
Perhaps someone would sacrifice their score to validate the idea that statistics work; operating alternate hours at high power and then low power and see if anyone can determine with certainty if it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00146.html (16,648 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu