Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\-Free\s+Zones\s+was\:\s+Re\:\s+Record\s+Number\s+of\s+SAC\s+CW\s+Logs\s+\-\-\s+Now\s+Grab\s+YourMicrophones\!\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest-Free Zones was: Re: Record Number of SAC CW Logs -- Now Grab YourMicrophones! (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 11:27:57 -0400
I think "band plans" is just a fancy name for contest-free zones, which are anathema to me, and have to question whether it makes any difference in a contest where the main complaint seems to be a la
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00034.html (11,316 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Free Zones was: Re: Record Number of SAC CW Logs -- Now Grab YourMicrophones! (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 21:34:37 +0400
Pete, We seem to agree on many issues here on the reflector, but if I understood you correctly, your opinion is that the Scandinavian Activity Contest is a contest with little activity? I would say t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00035.html (13,403 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Free Zones was: Re: Record Number of SAC CW Logs -- Now Grab YourMicrophones! (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:19:04 -0400
Sorry Mats, I did not mean to cast aspersions on the SAC - I think the same thing could be said with respect to contest-free zones in all contests, or at least all single-mode contests. After all, th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00036.html (10,152 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Free Zones was: Re: Record Number of SAC CW Logs -- Now Grab YourMicrophones! (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 22:24:09 +0400
Pete, I perfectly agree with you... WARC bands are underestimated when it comes to find contest-free bands or segments. Even during very heavy contests like CQWW, WPX, RDXC and others, I see that WAR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00037.html (10,478 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Free Zones was: Re: Record Number of SAC CW Logs -- Now Grab YourMicrophones! (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:10:17 -0400
Mats, There's two factors involved here. One is a bunch of anti-contest whiners, who spend time immemorial complaining on the various internet forums about "those darn contesters." Notice that those
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00045.html (12,479 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Free Zones was: Re: Record Number of SAC CW Logs -- Now Grab YourMicrophones! (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:13:41 -0800
Ron is right again. (Gawd, I hate it when I say that!) 73, de Hans, K0HB Mats, There's two factors involved here. One is a bunch of anti-contest whiners, who spend time immemorial complaining on the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00046.html (13,785 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Free Zones was: Re: Record Number of SAC CW Logs -- Now Grab YourMicrophones! (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <W4NZ@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 21:40:56 -0400
The problem with "contest-free" zones is that non-contesters never seem to know where they are. 73, Ted W4NZ --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00048.html (12,686 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Free Zones was: Re: Record Number of SAC CW Logs -- Now Grab YourMicrophones! (score: 1)
Author: "John KLim" <n3khk_jk@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:25:15 -0400
Hi all Interesting topic! If I remember correctly 12m, 17m, and 30m are contest free zones my 4 Cents (inflation) worth. That is not hard to remember is it? Again all flames to me and not to the refl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00049.html (10,051 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Free Zones was: Re: Record Number of SAC CW Logs -- Now Grab YourMicrophones! (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 23:22:32 -0500
If a CFZ is mandated in the rules, then it ought to be followed. However, I do have to add this: If I drive into downtown Winnipeg on a Winnipeg Jets game night (man, I love being able to say that ag
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00050.html (16,191 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Free Zones was: Re: Record Number of SAC CW Logs -- Now Grab YourMicrophones! (score: 1)
Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 21:42:03 -0700
The problem with "contest-free" zones is that non-contesters never seem to An additional problem with "contest-free" zones is that non-contesters want the zones to include all frequencies, all bands.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00051.html (9,627 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Free Zones was: Re: Record Number of SAC CW Logs -- Now Grab YourMicrophones! (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 08:04:00 -0400
Let me be clear - *if* non-contest zones are specified in the rules, they should be followed. My point is that they shouldn't be. 73, Pete N4ZR The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at ww
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00052.html (16,690 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu