Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+Cheating\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:03:36 EST
OK, we went thru this a few years ago with the spotting of club members, it was boring then, & is boring now. But, after thinking a bit, here are real problems that we need to deal with before we get
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00431.html (10,067 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "BlakeM" <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2030 21:03:51 -0500
guys! Here here! Perhaps Bob Marley was really singing about the packetcluster? blake n4gi -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional D
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00433.html (8,597 bytes)

3. RE: [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "J. Edward (Ed) Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:21:29 -0800
I agree that packet doesn't maximize your mults. Run this experiment ... Turn on packet and let it fill up your Band Map for an hour. Then, go to a band and tune from one end to the other, IDing eve
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00435.html (9,574 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:58:32 +0000
Hi Chuck and everyone else: I agree with just about everything except the conclusion. Let's keep unassisted for those of us that enjoy finding our own mults in some contests. The cheating problems se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00439.html (10,394 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:07:44 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Isn't going to go away? How about eliminating all forms of packet from contesting entirely? I've never understood what packet adds to the con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00442.html (9,554 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:58:29 -0500
At 11:07 AM 2/25/2004, Bill Turner wrote: I've never understood what packet adds to the contest experience. I used packet once or twice back in the nineties and have never used it since. Wouldn't it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00453.html (10,292 bytes)

7. RE: [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "Hanlon, Steve" <SHanlon@dnr.state.md.us>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:57:29 -0500
i believe there is value to having the two single-op categories. the exact reason as stated is enough justification. i can not commit 36 hours to a contest, esp. when the harmonic wants me to read h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00459.html (9,572 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:18:54 -0500
Can this be enforced? Not really. It can be exposed however, maybe bringing shame on the offender. This is a threat to us who play by the rules, in a big way. may as well make it legal for all classe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00460.html (11,465 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:52:02 -0600
Trying to eliminate cheating is noble. Accomplishing that goal is close to impossible, well today impossible. There are just too many ways to cheat and not get caught. Back in the 70s I was operating
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00234.html (8,379 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: ku8e@bellsouth.net
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:59:09 +0000
It seems lately we are hearing more about cheating going in contesting. The competition (especially in the eastern EU counties and Russia) is cutthroat. Many operators are trying to find a way to gai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00776.html (8,518 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:12:46 EDT
In my mind it is cheating only if a competitive advantage is gained, and I don't buy the idea that one was gained by not saying "fie-nie" before every qso number. If 4O3A (or anybody else) says "kilo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00786.html (8,514 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <n5ten@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
I am probably in a minority here, but I would much prefer to give an RST than a serial number. I deal with serial number contests, but really don't prefer them! 73s John AA5JG _______________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00788.html (7,776 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:30:51 -0600
It's not a competitive advantage ... It's all about acting stupid and sending that mindless 59 over and over and .... Doug "Those Island days are always on my mind, Someday I'm going to leave it all
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00795.html (8,659 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "K-ZERO-HB" <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:39:30 -0600
Oh, but the rule doesn't say send "mindless 59". It says send a signal report. "59" is only one of forty-five standard voice signal reports, and "599" is only one of several hundreds of standard morr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00803.html (8,428 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:00:27 -0400
What took the Mi QSO Party so long? The Pa QSO Party dropped the RS(T) report many years ago... at least 20 - 25 if memory serves. Which, I think, makes the exchange a touch more challenging, as you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00806.html (9,180 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:39:43 -0500
So Jim, What you're saying is that because there's no advantage to be gained, those champions of Worthless Causes arguing for dropping 59 should just shut up and follow the rules. Excellent point. Yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00809.html (10,008 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu