- 1. [CQ-Contest] Contest Log Processing (score: 1)
- Author: Lee Buller <k0wa@swbell.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:41:21 -0800 (PST)
- I've been working with a group to help put on the Kansas QSO Party this year. One of the issues that I've been thinking about is how are logs processed? I do NOT want to do them by hand. Are the Ca
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00233.html (7,554 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Log Processing (score: 1)
- Author: Alan Sewell N5NA <alan.n5na@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:39:43 -0600
- Lee, Try W3KM's Cabrillo Evaluator. http://mysite.verizon.net/dmascaro1/cabrillo.htm 73, Alan N5NA Lee Buller wrote: _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00237.html (8,405 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Log Processing (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:24:11 -0500
- What you need to do is get some sample cabrillo logs from as many different programs as you can before starting. When I bring a log in to work on it, the field order is different from log to log. So
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00249.html (9,195 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Contest Log Processing (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim" <k0rh@cox.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:04:50 -0600
- I think YOU need to be in charge of the Ks QSO party..........Jim _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00251.html (6,809 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Log Processing (score: 1)
- Author: "Franki ON5ZO" <on5zo@telenet.be>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:01:57 +0100
- This might be a controversial issue but I think today's programming languages provide powerfull tools to process ASCII data under the form of XML. If contest logs would come under the XML format with
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00256.html (8,136 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Log Processing (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:30:12 -0600
- As the logchecker for the Tennessee QSO Party I'd rather we stick with Cabrillo. It's not at all difficult to parse (even with the simplest languages - such as QBASIC!), is human-readable, and can be
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00258.html (12,347 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Log Processing (score: 1)
- Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:55:32 -0700
- N6TR, Tree was one of the lead Cabrillo guys. I would email him directly. I am sure he would be happy to assist. If not he will shoot me. :) --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.c
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00262.html (13,223 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu